PofoliaShared via Pofolia

New England Journal of Medicine· 2018Q1

A Randomized Trial of Epinephrine in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Gavin D. Perkins, Chen Ji, Charles D. Deakin, Tom Quinn et al.

Short summary

Epinephrine administration in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) increased 30-day survival by 3.2% vs. placebo (3.2% vs 2.4%, P=0.02), but did not improve favorable neurologic outcomes, with more survivors experiencing severe impairment (31.0% vs 17.8%).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Epinephrine use in OHCA patients resulted in a significantly higher rate of 30-day survival compared to placebo (3.2% vs. 2.4%).
  • There was no significant difference in survival with a favorable neurologic outcome between the epinephrine and placebo groups.
  • Severe neurologic impairment occurred in a greater proportion of survivors in the epinephrine group (31.0%) than in the placebo group (17.8%).
  • The trial involved 8014 patients across five UK ambulance services.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Concern about the use of epinephrine as a treatment for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest led the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation to call for a placebo-controlled trial to determine whether the use of epinephrine is safe and effective in such patients. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind trial involving 8014 patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United Kingdom, paramedics at five National Health Service ambulance services administered either parenteral epinephrine (4015 patients) or saline placebo (3999 patients), along with standard care. The primary outcome was the rate of survival at 30 days. Secondary outcomes included the rate of survival until hospital discharge with a favorable neurologic outcome, as indicated by a score of 3 or less on the modified Rankin scale (which ranges from 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). RESULTS: At 30 days, 130 patients (3.2%) in the epinephrine group and 94 (2.4%) in the placebo group were alive (unadjusted odds ratio for survival, 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 1.82; P=0.02). There was no evidence of a significant difference in the proportion of patients who survived until hospital discharge with a favorable neurologic outcome (87 of 4007 patients [2.2%] vs. 74 of 3994 patients [1.9%]; unadjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.61). At the time of hospital discharge, severe neurologic impairment (a score of 4 or 5 on the modified Rankin scale) had occurred in more of the survivors in the epinephrine group than in the placebo group (39 of 126 patients [31.0%] vs. 16 of 90 patients [17.8%]). CONCLUSIONS: In adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the use of epinephrine resulted in a significantly higher rate of 30-day survival than the use of placebo, but there was no significant between-group difference in the rate of a favorable neurologic outcome because more survivors had severe neurologic impairment in the epinephrine group. (Funded by the U.K. National Institute for Health Research and others; Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN73485024 .).

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Emergency Medicine

Emergency MedicineMedicine