PofoliaShared via Pofolia

European Political Science· 2026Q1

Democratic innovations and the field of Eurocracy: How field theory sheds light on the study of democratic innovations

Jessy Bailly

Short summary

This paper argues against conceptualizing a distinct 'field of democratic innovations' within the EU, proposing instead a 'reform space' that influences the broader European field of power.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to discuss the recent use of Bourdieu’s field theory in scholarship on democratic innovations. It seeks to extend these works’ effort to study democratic innovations within configurations of power relations. However, I argue that it is often unconvincing to conceptualise a field of democratic innovations or institutionalised participation when they are often too heteronomous in relation to the field of power. Instead, by extending the relevance of the Bourdieusian framework for the analysis of democratic innovations, the article invites reflection on the way promoters of democratic innovations constitute a social space – a ‘reform space’ – that is not a field but nonetheless provides resources to certain actors embedded in the field of power. The usefulness of this analytical framework is demonstrated by examining how the promoters of mini-publics at the EU level are positioned within the European field of power.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. European Political Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Key pointsIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways, key points and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Political Science and International Relations

Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences