PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Human-Centric Intelligent Systems· 2026Q1

A Machine-Learning-Based Diagnosis of English Language Anxiety Among Rural High School Students in a Non-Native English-Speaking Country

Md. Najmus Sakib Sourov, Md. Ataur Rahman, Asmaul Husna Juhana, Sabera Sultana et al.

Short summary

A Decision Tree model achieved 99.36% accuracy in diagnosing English Language Anxiety (ELA) among rural Bangladeshi high school students using only academic and demographic data, not FLCAS scores.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A Decision Tree model achieved 99.36% accuracy in diagnosing English Language Anxiety (ELA) using academic and demographic data.
  • Models were trained exclusively on academic and demographic features, excluding direct anxiety scale scores for prediction.
  • Key predictive features included English performance, other-subject performance, class level, school-wide English performance, and gender.
  • A 10-fold cross-validation showed stable performance with a mean accuracy of 99.15 ± 0.28%.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract English Language Anxiety (ELA) remains a significant barrier to academic success, particularly for students in regions where English is not the most spoken language. This study presents a lightweight and interpretable machine learning (ML)-based approach for the early detection of ELA among rural high school students in Bangladesh, a low-income, non-English-speaking country. Five supervised learning algorithms, Support Vector Machine (SVM), k -Nearest Neighbors ( k -NN), Naïve Bayes, Decision Tree, and Random Forest, were evaluated on 2,600 student records. Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety Scale (FLCAS) scores and teacher assessments were used only to construct ground-truth ELA labels, whereas the predictive models were trained exclusively on academic and demographic features. The Decision Tree achieved the highest accuracy (99.36%), with similarly strong performance across precision, recall, and $$\:{F}_{1}$$ -score, using the holdout evaluation method. Stratified 10-fold cross-validation produced a mean accuracy of 99.15 ± 0.28%, indicating stable internal performance at the student-record level. SHAP was used to quantify the contribution of the actual model inputs, including English performance, other-subject performance, class level, school-wide English performance, and gender. An independent qualitative evaluation by 15 experienced English teachers provided contextual support for the model’s findings. These results suggest that interpretable ML can provide useful decision support for ELA screening in resource-constrained rural educational settings, while external validation across unseen schools and districts remains necessary.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Human-Centric Intelligent Systems, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Language and Linguistics

Language and LinguisticsArts and Humanities