PofoliaShared via Pofolia

postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies· 2026Q2

Rubbing and rewriting: Medievalism in Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Buried Giant

Ziyang Li

Short summary

Kazuo Ishiguro's The Buried Giant uses a 'palimpsestic medievalism' to rewrite Arthurian myth, revealing how enforced forgetting of the Saxon massacre underpins exclusionary 'Arthurian Britishness'.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The Buried Giant employs a 'palimpsestic medievalism' that layers Arthurian tradition and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight.
  • Ishiguro critiques exclusionary 'Arthurian Britishness' by showing how it depends on forgetting the massacre of Saxons.
  • The novel explores how the return of memory does not guarantee reconciliation or revenge, but can lead to coexistence.
  • Gawain's refusal to attack strangers and the eventual dissipation of the mist of forgetting preserve possibilities for an open Britishness.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This article argues that Kazuo Ishiguro’s The Buried Giant recasts the Arthurian myth of British origins through what I deem a palimpsestic form of medievalism. This process of ‘rubbing and rewriting’ produces a layered chivalric romance in which Arthurian tradition and Sir Gawain and the Green Knight remain faintly legible as undertexts. Through the dragon Querig’s mist of forgetting, the wasteland containing the bones of slaughtered Saxons, and the demythologised portrayals of Arthur and Gawain, Ishiguro reveals how Arthur’s peace and Gawain’s chivalric loyalty become implicated in concealing the Britons’ massacre of the Saxons. The novel thereby challenges exclusionary nationalist notions of an ‘Arthurian Britishness’ that depend on enforced forgetting. Yet Edwin’s friendship with Axl and Beatrice, Gawain’s refusal to attack strangers on the grounds of rumour or foreign blood, and the moments of suspended boundaries that follow the return of memory all preserve the possibility of a more open Britishness. As the mist of forgetting dissipates, the return of painful memory brings neither stable reconciliation nor inevitable revenge. I ultimately argue that through the boatman’s test at the novel’s close, Ishiguro’s medievalism suggests that traumatic memory need not lead to retaliatory historical reckoning, opening instead a cautious yet affirmative vision of coexistence grounded in confronting historical trauma.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. postmedieval a journal of medieval cultural studies, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Literature and Literary Theory

Literature and Literary TheoryArts and Humanities