New England Journal of Medicine· 2015Q1
Lixisenatide in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Acute Coronary Syndrome
- 2,353citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
In patients with type 2 diabetes and recent acute coronary syndrome, lixisenatide did not significantly alter the rate of major cardiovascular events compared to placebo.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Lixisenatide was noninferior to placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent acute coronary syndrome.
- The hazard ratio for the primary composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina) was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.17).
- Lixisenatide did not demonstrate superiority over placebo for the primary endpoint.
- No significant differences were observed in hospitalization for heart failure or death rates between groups.
- Lixisenatide was not associated with increased rates of serious adverse events, severe hypoglycemia, pancreatitis, or neoplasms.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are higher among patients with type 2 diabetes, particularly those with concomitant cardiovascular diseases, than in most other populations. We assessed the effects of lixisenatide, a glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonist, on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes who had had a recent acute coronary event. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with type 2 diabetes who had had a myocardial infarction or who had been hospitalized for unstable angina within the previous 180 days to receive lixisenatide or placebo in addition to locally determined standards of care. The trial was designed with adequate statistical power to assess whether lixisenatide was noninferior as well as superior to placebo, as defined by an upper boundary of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio of less than 1.3 and 1.0, respectively, for the primary composite end point of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for unstable angina. RESULTS: The 6068 patients who underwent randomization were followed for a median of 25 months. A primary end-point event occurred in 406 patients (13.4%) in the lixisenatide group and in 399 (13.2%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.17), which showed the noninferiority of lixisenatide to placebo (P<0.001) but did not show superiority (P=0.81). There were no significant between-group differences in the rate of hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio in the lixisenatide group, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.23) or the rate of death (hazard ratio, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.78 to 1.13). Lixisenatide was not associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events or severe hypoglycemia, pancreatitis, pancreatic neoplasms, or allergic reactions than was placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and a recent acute coronary syndrome, the addition of lixisenatide to usual care did not significantly alter the rate of major cardiovascular events or other serious adverse events. (Funded by Sanofi; ELIXA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01147250.).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
Endocrinology, Diabetes and MetabolismMedicine