PofoliaPofolia ile paylaşıldı

BMC Oral Health· 2026Q1

Primer ikinci mandibular azı dişlerinde enstrümantasyon ve adeziv restorasyonun periservikal dentin stresi üzerindeki biyomekanik etkisi: sonlu elemanlar analizi

Biomechanical impact of instrumentation and adhesive restoration on pericervical dentin stress in primary second mandibular molars: a finite element analysis

Mathan Rajan Rajendran, Selvakumar Haridoss, K Anbarasi, Kavitha Swaminathan ve diğerleri

Kısa özet

Restorasyonsuz erişim kavitesi olan primer ikinci mandibular azı dişleri en yüksek periservikal dentin stresini gösterirken, adeziv kompozit rezin restorasyon stresleri önemli ölçüde eşitleyerek koniklik tasarımı farklılıklarını minimuma indirir.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Ana noktalar

  • Primer azı dişlerinde restorasyonsuz erişim kavitesi, en yüksek periservikal dentin (PCD) stresine neden olur.
  • Adeziv kompozit rezin restorasyonu, farklı enstrümantasyon koniklik tasarımları arasındaki stres farklılıklarını en aza indirir.
  • Adeziv kompozit rezin ile restore edilmiş dişler, sağlam dişlere benzer stres seviyeleri gösterir.
  • Periservikal dentin bölgesi, stres yoğunlaşması için kritik bölgedir.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Özet (abstract)

To evaluate the biomechanical impact of canal instrumentation techniques and adhesive coronal restoration on pericervical dentin (PCD) stress distribution in primary second mandibular molars using finite element analysis (FEA). Finite element models (FEMs) of primary second mandibular molars were constructed from high-resolution Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) scans. Five groups were analysed: Group I (Intact Teeth - Control), Group II (Access Cavity Preparation), Group III (XP-endo Shaper - Minimal taper), Group IV (Neoendo Pedoflex Files; 4% taper), and Group V (Kedo SG Files - Variable taper 4%–8%). Stress distribution patterns were analysed under occlusal loading at angles of 0°, 45°, and 90° in two critical regions: the coronal and radicular areas adjacent to the cemento-enamel junction (CEJ). The unrestored access cavity group (Group II) exhibited the highest stress concentrations under nearly all loading conditions examined. Among the three instrumented and adhesively restored groups (Groups III–V), only minimal Von Mises stress differences were observed, irrespective of the taper design, with all three groups closely approximating the intact tooth. The pericervical dentin zone represented the region of interest for stress concentration analysis in this study, and stress within this zone was elevated when the coronal restoration was absent. The unrestored access-cavity model (ACP) showed the highest pericervical dentin stress values among the groups studied. Adhesive composite resin restoration appeared to exert a substantial biomechanical equalising effect, reducing taper-related differences to a small magnitude within this model, although the independent contribution of restoration could not be isolated from instrumentation. Prompt, well-bonded adhesive coronal restoration following pulpectomy is an important step in preserving pericervical dentin integrity. Prompt placement of adhesive coronal restoration following pulpectomy in primary molars appears to be an important component of preserving structural integrity, alongside the choice of instrumentation. Regardless of the file system selected, coronal sealing with adhesive composite resin should be prioritised as an integral step in conservative paediatric endodontic management.

Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. BMC Oral Health, 2026 · DOI ↗

ÇıkarımlarUygulamada
Makaleye SorUygulamada

Devamı Pofolia uygulamasında

Çıkarımlar ve makaleye soru sorma; ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Ücretsiz.

Web'de giriş yaparak aç

Alan: Ağız Cerrahisi

Oral SurgeryDentistry