New England Journal of Medicine· 2014Q1
Idelalisib and Rituximab in Relapsed Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
- 1,690citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2014year
Short summary
Combining idelalisib with rituximab significantly improved progression-free survival (not reached vs. 5.5 months), overall response rate (81% vs. 13%), and 12-month overall survival (92% vs. 80%) in relapsed CLL patients unable to tolerate standard chemotherapy.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Idelalisib plus rituximab significantly improved progression-free survival (HR 0.15, P<0.001) in relapsed CLL patients.
- Overall response rates were 81% with idelalisib/rituximab vs. 13% with placebo/rituximab (OR 29.92, P<0.001).
- 12-month overall survival was improved: 92% vs. 80% (HR 0.28, P=0.02).
- Serious adverse events were comparable: 40% vs. 35%.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) who have clinically significant coexisting medical conditions are less able to undergo standard chemotherapy. Effective therapies with acceptable side-effect profiles are needed for this patient population. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of idelalisib, an oral inhibitor of the delta isoform of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, in combination with rituximab versus rituximab plus placebo. We randomly assigned 220 patients with decreased renal function, previous therapy-induced myelosuppression, or major coexisting illnesses to receive rituximab and either idelalisib (at a dose of 150 mg) or placebo twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. At the first prespecified interim analysis, the study was stopped early on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring board owing to overwhelming efficacy. RESULTS: The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months in the placebo group and was not reached in the idelalisib group (hazard ratio for progression or death in the idelalisib group, 0.15; P<0.001). Patients receiving idelalisib versus those receiving placebo had improved rates of overall response (81% vs. 13%; odds ratio, 29.92; P<0.001) and overall survival at 12 months (92% vs. 80%; hazard ratio for death, 0.28; P=0.02). Serious adverse events occurred in 40% of the patients receiving idelalisib and rituximab and in 35% of those receiving placebo and rituximab. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of idelalisib and rituximab, as compared with placebo and rituximab, significantly improved progression-free survival, response rate, and overall survival among patients with relapsed CLL who were less able to undergo chemotherapy. (Funded by Gilead; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01539512.).
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. New England Journal of Medicine, 2014 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Genetics (Medicine)
GeneticsMedicine