Biology of Sex Differences· 2026Q1
Evaluating sex as a modifier of cardiomyocyte relaxation in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: calcium handling, titin, and bioenergetics
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Current evidence does not support sex as a sole determinant for classifying HFpEF subtypes or guiding treatment, as reported sex differences in cardiomyocyte relaxation mechanisms (calcium handling, titin, bioenergetics) are inconsistent and model-dependent.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- No reproducible sex-specific mechanisms were found for active relaxation (calcium handling) or passive stiffness (titin) in HFpEF cardiomyocytes.
- The late sodium current was the only active-relaxation endpoint with a reported formal sex×disease interaction, which was electrophysiological, not mechanical.
- Titin- and NAD+-related interventions modified diastolic phenotypes in HFpEF models, but without replicated sex-modified mechanical responses.
- Human studies confirm active relaxation abnormalities, passive stiffness, and metabolic remodeling in HFpEF, but the role of sex is unresolved.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Background Women are disproportionately affected by heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), particularly at older ages, but this epidemiological pattern does not establish sex-modified cardiomyocyte mechanisms. We evaluated whether current evidence supports reproducible sex modification of the cellular processes governing diastolic function. Main body We separated cardiomyocyte diastolic dysfunction into calcium- and myofilament-dependent active relaxation and titin-dependent passive stiffness, with mitochondrial bioenergetics and redox state linking these processes. We assessed formal sex×disease or sex×target interactions, direct mechanical evidence, replication, and human translation. Findings varied with model, strain, age, reproductive state, disease driver, stage, and assay. Among the included studies, late sodium current was the only active-relaxation-related cellular endpoint with a reported formal sex×disease interaction, and this interaction was electrophysiological rather than mechanical. Titin- and NAD⁺-related interventions modified diastolic phenotypes in several HFpEF-like models, but none established a replicated sex-modified mechanical response. Human ventricular studies documented active-relaxation abnormalities, passive stiffness, and metabolic remodeling in separate cohorts, but the role of sex in these findings remains unresolved. Conclusion Current evidence does not justify using sex alone to define calcium- or titin-dominant HFpEF endotypes or select treatments. Reported differences are limited and vary with the model, endpoint, and clinical context. Prespecified sex comparisons linked to a relevant functional endpoint could help clarify the biological significance of these differences.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Biology of Sex Differences, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular MedicineMedicine