PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Information Management· 2023Q1

Opinion Paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy

Yogesh K. Dwivedi, Nir Kshetri, Laurie Hughes, Emma Slade et al.

Short summary

This opinion paper synthesizes 43 expert contributions on generative AI like ChatGPT, highlighting its potential to boost productivity across industries while also raising significant ethical, legal, and practical challenges.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Generative AI like ChatGPT can significantly enhance productivity and business activities.
  • Key challenges include ethical concerns, legal issues, privacy threats, bias, and misinformation.
  • Expert opinions are divided on whether the use of ChatGPT should be restricted or legislated.
  • Further research is needed on AI skills, bias, optimal implementation, human-AI collaboration, accuracy assessment, and ethical/legal frameworks.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Transformative artificially intelligent tools, such as ChatGPT, designed to generate sophisticated text indistinguishable from that produced by a human, are applicable across a wide range of contexts. The technology presents opportunities as well as, often ethical and legal, challenges, and has the potential for both positive and negative impacts for organisations, society, and individuals. Offering multi-disciplinary insight into some of these, this article brings together 43 contributions from experts in fields such as computer science, marketing, information systems, education, policy, hospitality and tourism, management, publishing, and nursing. The contributors acknowledge ChatGPT’s capabilities to enhance productivity and suggest that it is likely to offer significant gains in the banking, hospitality and tourism, and information technology industries, and enhance business activities, such as management and marketing. Nevertheless, they also consider its limitations, disruptions to practices, threats to privacy and security, and consequences of biases, misuse, and misinformation. However, opinion is split on whether ChatGPT’s use should be restricted or legislated. Drawing on these contributions, the article identifies questions requiring further research across three thematic areas: knowledge, transparency, and ethics; digital transformation of organisations and societies; and teaching, learning, and scholarly research. The avenues for further research include: identifying skills, resources, and capabilities needed to handle generative AI; examining biases of generative AI attributable to training datasets and processes; exploring business and societal contexts best suited for generative AI implementation; determining optimal combinations of human and generative AI for various tasks; identifying ways to assess accuracy of text produced by generative AI; and uncovering the ethical and legal issues in using generative AI across different contexts.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Information Management, 2023 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Health Informatics

Health InformaticsMedicine