PofoliaShared via Pofolia

· 2019· Dissertation

EFEKTIVITAS KAMERA TERMAL PADA SMARTPHONE DIBANDINGKAMERA DIGITAL SMARTPHONE DAN OBSERVASI LANGSUNG DALAM MONITORING VIABILITAS FLAP

Nim Arif Rahmat Muharram

Short summary

Smartphone thermal cameras detect non-viable flaps significantly earlier (median 2h) than direct observation or digital camera (median 66h), though not statistically superior in all measures.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Smartphone thermal cameras detected non-viable flaps at a median of 2 hours.
  • Direct observation and smartphone digital cameras detected non-viable flaps at a median of 66 hours.
  • The thermal camera's earlier detection was statistically significant (χ2(2)=10, p=0.007).
  • Interpretation agreement between smartphone thermal camera and direct observation was 76.7% (κ=0.574).
  • Interpretation agreement between smartphone thermal camera and smartphone digital camera was 76.7% (κ=0.572).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Background: Flap is a surgical method for defect closure. Post operation observation is very important for detecting and preventing flap failure. As a gold standard, direct observation is quite challenging since there is competency difference among observers. recently, the using of smartphone thermal camera for detecting pedicle flap of the skin is emerging as a new innovation. This research will use smartphone thermal camera as a device for flap observation by comparing with direct conventional observation and smartphone digital camera imaging. Methods: This research is using observational post test only control group design with 58 hours follow up (n=8 divided in 3 groups). Observing with smartphone thermal camera effectiveness will be compared with direct observation and smartphone digital camera. The data will be tabulated and be compared. The flaps that are included in this research are random flaps > 10 cm in width, axial flaps, and free flaps. Result: median time for non viable flap finding at direct and smartphone digital camera smartphone is 66h or viable until observation is ended. median time for non viable flap finding at smartphone thermal camera is 2h. smartphone thermal camera detect non viable flap earlier than two others, but statistically not superior. (χ2(2)= 10, p=0,007). 76,7% direct observation has same interpretation with smartphone thermal camera interpretation. (κ=0,574, Syg. 0,051) 76,7% digital smartphone interpretation has same interpretation with smartphone thermal camera interpretation. (κ=0,572, Syg. 0,051) Conclusion: Smartphone thermal camera has yet clinically proven for flap observation. Smartphone thermal camera could be alternative for flap observation.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2019 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthMedicine