PofoliaShared via Pofolia

PubMed· 2015

Recommendations for laparoscopic liver resection: a report from the second international consensus conference held in Morioka.

Go Wakabayashi, Daniel Cherqui, David A. Geller, Joseph E. Buell et al.

Short summary

Minor laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) are now standard practice (IDEAL 3), while major LLRs remain innovative (IDEAL 2b), requiring continued cautious introduction and higher quality studies.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Minor laparoscopic liver resections (LLRs) are now considered standard practice (IDEAL 3).
  • Major LLRs are still in the innovative/exploration phase (IDEAL 2b).
  • Continued cautious introduction of major LLRs is recommended.
  • Available evidence quality for LLR outcomes is low (GRADE), necessitating higher quality studies.
  • A formal education structure is needed for major LLR due to its steep learning curve.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The use of laparoscopy for liver surgery is increasing rapidly. The Second International Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Liver Resections (LLR) was held in Morioka, Japan, from October 4 to 6, 2014 to evaluate the current status of laparoscopic liver surgery and to provide recommendations to aid its future development. Seventeen questions were addressed. The first 7 questions focused on outcomes that reflect the benefits and risks of LLR. These questions were addressed using the Zurich-Danish consensus conference model in which the literature and expert opinion were weighed by a 9-member jury, who evaluated LLR outcomes using GRADE and a list of comparators. The jury also graded LLRs by the Balliol Classification of IDEAL. The jury concluded that MINOR LLRs had become standard practice (IDEAL 3) and that MAJOR liver resections were still innovative procedures in the exploration phase (IDEAL 2b). Continued cautious introduction of MAJOR LLRs was recommended. All of the evidence available for scrutiny was of LOW quality by GRADE, which prompted the recommendation for higher quality evaluative studies. The last 10 questions focused on technical questions and the recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion. Recommendations were made regarding preoperative evaluation, bleeding controls, transection methods, anatomic approaches, and equipment. Both experts and jury recognized the need for a formal structure of education for those interested in performing major laparoscopic LLR because of the steep learning curve.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PubMed, 2015 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Hepatology

HepatologyMedicine