Pest Management Science· 2026Q1
Adoption of complementary green production technologies among Ethiopian smallholder farmers
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Ethiopian smallholder wheat farmers adopt green production technologies (GPTs) like green pest control, soil testing, and organic fertilizer jointly, with adoption intensity influenced by factors such as family size, education, income, perceived benefits, and access to information and services.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Smallholder wheat farmers in Ethiopia tend to adopt green pest control, soil testing, and organic fertilizer technologies jointly.
- Family size, education, income, perceived benefits, and declining soil fertility positively influence adoption and intensity.
- Perceived risks, high technology costs, and market distance negatively impact adoption decisions.
- Access to communication assets, training, extension services, and farmer groups are associated with higher adoption and use of GPTs.
- Significant spatial differences exist in farmers' adoption behavior across wheat-producing regions.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract BACKGROUND Green production technologies (GPTs) are essential for improving the ecological sustainability and economic efficiency of agriculture. However, evidence on the joint adoption, intensity of use, and knowledge of multiple GPTs remains limited in Ethiopia. This study examined the adoption of green pest control, soil testing and fertilization, and organic fertilizer among 506 wheat‐growing households. A multivariate probit model, zero‐inflated Poisson regression, and double‐hurdle model were employed. RESULTS The results revealed significant complementarities among the three GPTs, indicating that farmers tend to adopt them jointly. Family size, education, annual income, perceived benefits, declining soil fertility, and the prevalence of crop diseases and pests positively influenced adoption decisions and adoption intensity. In contrast, perceived risks, high technology costs, and greater distance from markets negatively affected adoption. Ownership of communication assets, participation in agricultural training, access to extension services, and membership in farmer groups were positively associated with the adoption and use of GPTs. The results also demonstrated significant spatial heterogeneity in farmers' adoption behavior across wheat‐producing locations. CONCLUSION GPT adoption is shaped by household resources, perceptions, access to information, market constraints, and location‐specific conditions. Policies should promote integrated technology packages, strengthen extension and training services, support farmer organizations, and reduce technology costs and market‐access barriers. These findings advance understanding of the interdependence of green technologies and the factors influencing their adoption and intensity of use in smallholder wheat production. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Pest Management Science, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
General Agricultural and Biological SciencesAgricultural and Biological Sciences