Obesity Science & Practice· 2026Q2
The Weight Management Hope Scale: Initial Validation of a Measure to Assess Goal‐Directed Thinking in Obesity Research and Practice
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new 6-item Weight Management Hope Scale (WMHS) shows good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79) and validity, correlating with hope, self-efficacy, and goal commitment, and negatively with BMI (r = -0.24) and positively with percent weight loss (r = 0.21) in 395 adults with obesity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The 6-item Weight Management Hope Scale (WMHS) was developed and validated in 395 U.S. adults with current or former obesity.
- WMHS demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.79) and supported a two-factor structure.
- The scale showed strong convergent validity, correlating with dispositional hope (r = 0.50), weight loss self-efficacy (r = 0.62), and goal commitment (r = 0.50).
- Criterion validity was supported by negative associations with BMI (r = -0.24) and positive associations with percent weight loss (r = 0.21).
- WMHS accounted for unique variance in BMI beyond other psychological constructs, demonstrating incremental validity.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Hope is a cognitive‐motivational construct associated with improved goal performance, yet it has been understudied in the domain of weight management. This study developed the Weight Management Hope Scale (WMHS) and evaluated its psychometric properties. Methods WMHS items were developed and underwent expert review to assess content validity. A sample of 395 U.S. adults with current or former obesity and active weight loss or maintenance goals completed a cross‐sectional survey including the WMHS and other validation measures. Exploratory factor analyses assessed dimensionality and guided item reduction. Internal consistency was evaluated through Cronbach alpha. Convergent and criterion validity were assessed through bivariate correlations, and incremental validity through hierarchical linear regression models. Results Exploratory factor analysis supported a two‐factor structure. The final 6‐item WMHS demonstrated good internal consistency ( α = 0.79) and correlated with dispositional hope ( r = 0.50), weight loss self‐efficacy ( r = 0.62), and goal commitment ( r = 0.50), supporting convergent validity. Criterion validity was evidenced by negative associations with BMI ( r s = −0.24, p < 0.001) and lifetime weight loss attempts ( r s = −0.14, p = 0.006); WMHS scores were also positively associated with percent weight loss from lifetime maximum weight ( r s = 0.21, p < 0.001). WMHS scores accounted for unique variance in BMI beyond dispositional hope, weight loss self‐efficacy, and goal commitment (Δ R = 0.01 to 0.03, all p < 0.05), demonstrating incremental validity. Conclusions The WMHS is a brief, reliable, and valid measure of weight management hope. It holds promise for use in weight management research and practice, where understanding goal‐directed thinking is critical for supporting sustained engagement and tailoring support.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Obesity Science & Practice, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Applied Psychology
Applied PsychologyPsychology