International Dental Journal· 2026Q1
Fotoğraflardan İndekslere: Derin Öğrenme Tabanlı Fotoğrafik DMFT (pDMFT)
From Photos to Indices: Deep Learning-Based Photographic DMFT (pDMFT)
- 0atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2026yıl
Kısa özet
pDMFT-AI adlı bir yapay zeka sistemi, ağız içi fotoğraflardan Çürük-Kayıp-Dolgulu Diş (DMFT) indekslerini doğru bir şekilde skorlar; 18.247 diş üzerinde %91,7 hassasiyet ve %98,9 özgüllük elde etmiştir.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- pDMFT-AI, ağız içi fotoğraflarından DMFT indeksi skorlamasını otomatikleştirir.
- Sistem, 18.247 dişlik test setinde %91,7 hassasiyet ve %98,9 özgüllük elde etmiştir.
- Yapay zeka performansı, uzman diş hekimleriyle mükemmel uyum göstermiştir (ICC=0,90).
- Yapay zeka modeli, Grad-CAM ısı haritaları ile gösterildiği gibi klinik olarak ilgili bölgelere odaklanmaktadır.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
Introduction Timely, accurate Decayed-Missing-Filled Tooth (DMFT) data are essential for caries surveillance, but conventional examinations are resource-intensive. Objective This study aims to develop and evaluate pDMFT-AI, an automated system for photographic DMFT (pDMFT) scoring from intraoral images, as a scalable proxy for remote caries monitoring. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 5000 intraoral photographs (89,825 permanent teeth) acquired in oral health surveys in Vietnam, evenly distributed across five standardized views. Two dentists independently assigned pDMFT codes to each tooth, with disagreements adjudicated by an expert (κ = 0.82-0.83). Teeth were automatically segmented and enumerated using SegmentAnyTooth to crop tooth-level images and detect missing teeth. A multi-label classifier with a ConvNeXt-Tiny backbone, trained with self-supervised and transfer learning, predicted four conditions: decayed, filled, prosthetic, and not recorded. Data were split 70/10/20 into training, validation, and test sets; performance was evaluated on 18,247 teeth. Results On the test set, pDMFT-AI achieved mean sensitivity 0.917 (95% CI: 0.902-0.932), specificity 0.989 (95% CI: 0.988-0.990), and average precision 0.948 (95% CI: 0.933-0.959). Per-class sensitivities were 0.881 to 0.940 and specificities 0.982-0.998. Subject-level agreement between pDMFT-AI and expert annotations was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.90, 95% CI: 0.87-0.93). Grad-CAM heatmaps indicated the model focus on clinically relevant regions. Conclusion pDMFT-AI showed high accuracy for automated pDMFT assessment from intraoral photographs and may support large-scale photographic caries surveillance. Clinical relevance By automating tooth- and arch-level pDMFT scoring from intraoral photographs, pDMFT-AI could streamline high-volume screenings and facilitate standardized monitoring when chairside examinations are limited.
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. International Dental Journal, 2026 · DOI ↗
Devamı Pofolia uygulamasında
Çıkarımlar ve makaleye soru sorma; ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Ücretsiz.
Web'de giriş yaparak açAlan: Ağız Cerrahisi
Oral SurgeryDentistry