PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Pest Management Science· 2026Q1

How rural education affects farmers' integrated management of invasive insect pests?

Liyun Zhang, Shengqing Yang, Peng Han, Patcharin Krutmuang

Short summary

A study of 666 Chinese farmers found that while rural education generally improves integrated pest management (IPM) capacity, the *type* of educational approach and strategy significantly influences outcomes, with traditional methods showing consistent links to high capacity.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Farmers show medium to high capacity in pest recognition, control, and container management, but deficiencies in health awareness.
  • Agricultural retail stores and training workshops have selective relationships with farmers' IPM capacity.
  • Farming experience and social media use show mixed associations with IPM capacity.
  • Non-public-private partnership, single, and individual strategies differentiate farmer capacity, linking to high-capacity farmers for knowledge-intensive practices and low-capacity for simple routines.
  • Traditional strategies consistently associate with high-capacity farmers across multiple practices.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Rural education helps manage invasive insect pests (IIPs), but how it affects farmers' integrated IIP management remains unknown. We focused on the nationally concerning fall armyworm in China's main invasion area, developed a multidimensional integrated framework, conducted household interviews with a sample size of 666, and applied multinomial logistic regression to assess farmers' integrated pest management capacity and its associations with educational approaches and strategies. RESULTS Farmers demonstrated medium to high capacity in recognition, control, and container management, but showed deficiencies in health awareness. Agricultural retail stores were the most common approach, while the dominant strategies were traditional, non‐public–private partnership, and individual. In all significant associations ( versus high capacity), agricultural retail stores and training workshops had selective relationships with medium (odds ratio (OR) 3.94) and high (OR 0.34) capacities, respectively; farming experience had broad but uneven links (OR 0.46–7.60 across all capacities); social media displayed a mixed profile (OR 0.26–2.73 across all capacities). Similarly, non‐public–private partnership, single, and individual strategies differentiated farmer capacity (OR 0.19–9.38 across all capacities), associating with high‐capacity farmers for knowledge‐intensive practices but with low‐capacity farmers for simple routines. Traditional strategies showed the most consistent associations with high‐capacity farmers in multiple practices (OR 0.27–2.94 across all capacities). CONCLUSION These findings highlight the integrated roles of rural education in IIP management and support a shift from mono‐strategic to integrated education systems. Blending diverse approaches and pairing divergent strategies with collaborative models help build a balanced knowledge infrastructure, equipping farmers with multifaceted skills for integrated IIP management. © 2026 Society of Chemical Industry.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Pest Management Science, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Insect Science

Insect ScienceAgricultural and Biological Sciences