European Heart Journal· 2019Q1
Trends in thrombolytic treatment and outcomes of acute pulmonary embolism in Germany
- 512citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2019year
Short summary
Systemic thrombolysis for acute pulmonary embolism (PE) increased slightly (3.1% to 4.4%) in Germany from 2005-2015, yet remained underutilized in hemodynamically unstable patients (23.1%). This treatment was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality for PE patients with shock (OR 0.42) and those undergoing CPR (OR 0.92).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Acute PE incidence in Germany increased from 85 to 109 per 100,000 population/year (2005-2015).
- In-hospital case fatality rates for PE decreased from 20.4% to 13.9% (2005-2015).
- Systemic thrombolysis use in PE patients rose from 3.1% to 4.4% (2005-2015).
- Thrombolysis reduced in-hospital mortality in PE patients with shock (OR 0.42) and those undergoing CPR (OR 0.92).
- Only 23.1% of hemodynamically unstable PE patients received thrombolysis.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
AIMS: Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common cardiovascular cause of death; systemic thrombolysis is potentially lifesaving treatment in patients presenting with haemodynamic instability. We investigated trends in the use of systemic thrombolysis and the outcome of patients with acute PE. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed data on the characteristics, comorbidities, treatment, and in-hospital outcome of 885 806 PE patients in Germany between 2005 and 2015. Incidence of acute PE was 99/100 000 population/year and increased from 85/100 000 in 2005 to 109/100 000 in 2015 [β 0.32 (0.26-0.38), P < 0.001]. During the same period, in-hospital case fatality rates decreased from 20.4% to 13.9% [β -0.51 (-0.52 to -0.49), P < 0.001]. The overall proportion of patients treated with systemic thrombolysis increased from 3.1% in 2005 to 4.4% in 2015 [β 0.28 (0.25-0.31), P < 0.001]. Thrombolysis was associated with lower in-hospital mortality rates in patients with haemodynamic instability, both in those with shock not necessitating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or mechanical ventilation [odds ratio (OR) 0.42 (0.37-0.48), P < 0.001], and in those who underwent CPR [OR 0.92 (0.87-0.97), P = 0.002]. This association was independent from age, sex, and comorbidities. However, systemic thrombolysis was administered to only 23.1% of haemodynamically unstable patients. CONCLUSION: Although the proportion of PE patients treated with systemic thrombolysis increased slightly in Germany between 2005 and 2015, only the minority of haemodynamically unstable patients currently receive this treatment. In the nationwide inpatient cohort, thrombolytic therapy was associated with reduced in-hospital mortality rates in PE patients with shock, and also in those who underwent CPR.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. European Heart Journal, 2019 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Internal Medicine
Internal MedicineMedicine