Scientific Reports· 2026Q1
Divergent HIF isoform association is linked to hypoxia responses in Mesenchymal stromal cells and human dermal fibroblasts
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) exhibit distinct adaptive responses to hypoxia, with MSCs undergoing broader transcriptomic remodeling (2-4x more differentially expressed genes) and a stronger reliance on HIF1A, while HDFs show greater HIF2A/HIF3A association and more restrained adaptation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- MSCs showed 2-4x more differentially expressed genes than HDFs under hypoxia.
- MSC hypoxia responses were primarily HIF1A-centered, while HDF responses showed stronger HIF2A/HIF3A association.
- Both cell types had shared and cell-type-specific hypoxia-responsive genes.
- Hypoxia induced distinct and non-overlapping surface-marker remodeling in MSCs and HDFs.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Hypoxia is a fundamental microenvironmental signal that shapes stromal cell behavior in tissue repair, fibrosis, and regenerative medicine. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) and fibroblasts share overlapping phenotypic features under standard culture conditions, yet whether they engage equivalent adaptive programs under hypoxic stress remains unclear. Here, we performed comparative transcriptomic analyses to define and contrast hypoxia responses in MSCs and human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). Both cell types mounted robust hypoxia-responsive programs; however, MSCs exhibited substantially broader transcriptomic remodeling, with two- to four-fold more differentially expressed genes than HDFs. Although a conserved subset of hypoxia-responsive genes was shared, most regulated transcripts were cell-type-specific, indicating distinct adaptive architectures. Pathway and co-expression analyses further revealed divergent HIF-associated signaling structure: MSC responses were more strongly aligned with HIF1A-centered regulatory networks, whereas HDF responses showed relatively stronger HIF2A/HIF3A-associated organization. Despite overlapping baseline stromal marker profiles, hypoxia induced pronounced and non-overlapping surface-marker remodeling in the two cell types, linking regulatory divergence to phenotypic state changes. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that hypoxia does not simply amplify a common stromal program, but instead exposes latent cell-type-specific strategies of adaptation. MSCs undergo broader and more plastic remodeling, whereas fibroblasts adopt a comparatively restrained but distinct regulatory state. These results refine the interpretation of stromal identity under stress conditions and have implications for regenerative medicine, fibrosis biology, and cell manufacturing.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗
The rest is in the Pofolia app
Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.
Sign in on the web to openField: Genetics (Medicine)
GeneticsMedicine