New England Journal of Medicine· 2018Q1· Clinical trial

Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer

Pedro T. Ramírez, Michael Frumovitz, René Pareja, Aldo López et al.

1,872citations
Q1SCImago
2018year

Short summary

Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer was associated with significantly lower disease-free survival (86.0% vs. 96.5%) and overall survival (93.8% vs. 99.0%) compared to open abdominal surgery.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

TakeawaysIn the app

Key pointsIn the app

Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways, key points and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Get it on Google Play Download on the App Store

Field: Obstetrics and Gynecology

Obstetrics and GynecologyMedicine