PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence· 2026Q1

Case-knowledge-guided construction-phase safety appraisal report generation for hydraulic and hydropower projects using large language models

Xuezhou Zhu, Zhaolin Liu, Jialin Yu, Quansheng Zhao et al.

Short summary

A novel case-knowledge-guided workflow for LLM-based safety appraisal reports in hydropower projects achieved an 82% Conclusion Support Rate (CSR) with a 28% Hallucination Rate (HR) after one evidence supplementation round, significantly outperforming standard RAG (32% CSR, 15% HR).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A new case-knowledge-guided workflow was developed for LLM-based safety appraisal report generation in hydropower projects.
  • The workflow integrates structured knowledge extraction, appraisal planning, and iterative evidence-grounded conclusion generation.
  • An LLM-based evaluation suite using Conclusion Support Rate (CSR) and Hallucination Rate (HR) was introduced and validated.
  • The proposed workflow achieved an 82% CSR and 28% HR after one evidence supplementation round, outperforming standard RAG (32% CSR, 15% HR).
  • A single round of evidence supplementation was found to be the optimal trade-off, as further supplementation increased hallucination risk.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Safety appraisal during the construction phase of hydraulic and hydropower projects requires professionals to review large volumes of multi-source documents. This manual process is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and vulnerable to evidence omission. Existing automated tools struggle to adapt: rule-checking relies heavily on formalized rules, while current retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) applications are fragmented into single-pass tasks, lacking macroscopic planning and explicit control over evidence use. To address this gap, this study proposes a case-knowledge-guided workflow for generating appraisal reports using large language models (LLMs). The workflow integrates structured knowledge extraction, executable appraisal planning, and iterative evidence-grounded conclusion generation, yielding checkable intermediate products at each stage. We also introduce an LLM-based evaluation suite utilizing Conclusion Support Rate (CSR) and Hallucination Rate (HR), which was validated against expert annotations and showed sufficient agreement for comparative evaluation. A real-world study used 30 historical reports and 9 application cases encompassing 160 evidence documents. Evaluation showed that standard RAG achieved a CSR of only 32% with a 15% HR. In contrast, the proposed workflow reached an 82% CSR after one round of gap-driven evidence supplementation, accompanied by a moderate HR increase to 28%. These results reveal that further evidence supplementation increased hallucination risk in this setting, making a single augmentation round the best observed trade-off. Ultimately, explicit appraisal planning and case-derived knowledge significantly improve conclusion supportability. By making the end-to-end generation process observable step-by-step, this framework provides an auditable pathway for applying LLMs to high-risk engineering appraisals while preserving human expert review.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysIn the app
Ask the paperIn the app

The rest is in the Pofolia app

Takeaways and questions to the paper; new summaries every day for your field. Free.

Sign in on the web to open

Field: Radiological and Ultrasound Technology

Radiological and Ultrasound TechnologyHealth Professions