PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics· 2018Q2

The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions

Malcolm G. Munro, Hilary Critchley, Ian S. Fraser

Short summary

The FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee revised its 2011 systems for defining normal/abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) symptoms and classifying AUB causes (PALM-COEIN) in 2018.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • FIGO's 2011 systems for AUB symptoms and causes have been revised in 2018.
  • The revisions aim to harmonize definitions and classifications for AUB.
  • The PALM-COEIN system categorizes causes of AUB.
  • The update process involved global experts and iterative review.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) systems for nomenclature of symptoms of normal and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) in the reproductive years (FIGO AUB System 1) and for classification of causes of AUB (FIGO AUB System 2; PALM-COEIN) were first published together in 2011. The purpose was to harmonize the definitions of normal and abnormal bleeding symptoms and to classify and subclassify underlying potential causes of AUB in the reproductive years to facilitate research, education, and clinical care. The systems were designed to be flexible and to be periodically reviewed and modified as appropriate. OBJECTIVES: To review, clarify, and, where appropriate, revise the previously published systems. METHODOLOGY AND OUTCOME: To a large extent, the process has been an iterative one involving the FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee, as well as a number of invited contributions from epidemiologists, gynecologists, and other experts in the field from around the world between 2012 and 2017. Face-to-face meetings have been held in Rome, Vancouver, and Singapore, and have been augmented by a number of teleconferences and other communications designed to evaluate various aspects of the systems. Where substantial change was considered, anonymous voting, in some instances using a modified RAND Delphi technique, was utilized.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 2018 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Obstetrics and Gynecology

Obstetrics and GynecologyMedicine