Cancer· 2017Q1
Confirmation of ProMisE: A simple, genomics‐based clinical classifier for endometrial cancer
- 970citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2017year
Short summary
The ProMisE classifier, using readily available immunohistochemistry and sequencing, accurately categorizes endometrial cancer (EC) into four prognostic subgroups with distinct survival outcomes, outperforming current ESMO risk stratification.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- The ProMisE classifier successfully categorized all 319 endometrial cancer cases into four prognostic subgroups.
- Tumors with POLE exonuclease domain mutations showed the best prognosis, while those with p53 abnormal mutations had the worst.
- ProMisE significantly improved the ability to discriminate outcomes compared to the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) risk stratification.
- The molecular classification provides prognostic information independent of established clinicopathologic risk factors.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Classification of endometrial carcinomas (ECs) by morphologic features is irreproducible and imperfectly reflects tumor biology. The authors developed the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE), a molecular classification system based on The Cancer Genome Atlas genomic subgroups, and sought to confirm both feasibility and prognostic ability in a new, large cohort of ECs. METHODS: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the presence or absence of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins (to identify MMR deficiency [MMR-D]), sequencing for polymerase-ɛ (POLE) exonuclease domain mutations (POLE EDMs), and IHC for tumor protein 53 (p53) (wild type vs null/missense mutations; p53 wt and p53 abn, respectively) were performed on 319 new EC samples. Subgroups were characterized and assessed relative to outcomes. The prognostic ability of ProMisE was compared with that of current risk-stratification systems (European Society of Medical Oncology [ESMO]). RESULTS: ProMisE decision-tree classification achieved categorization of all cases and identified 4 prognostic subgroups with distinct overall, disease-specific, and progression-free survival (P < .001). Tumors with POLE EDMs had the most favorable prognosis, and those with p53 abn the worst prognosis, and separation of the 2 middle survival curves (p53 wt and MMR-D) was observed. There were no significant differences in survival between the ESMO low-risk and intermediate-risk groups. ProMisE improved the ability to discriminate outcomes compared with ESMO risk stratification. There was substantial overlap (89%) between the p53 abn and high-risk ESMO subgroups; but, otherwise, there were no predictable associations between molecular and ESMO risk groups. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular classification of ECs can be achieved using clinically applicable methods and provides independent prognostic information beyond established clinicopathologic risk factors available at diagnosis. Consistent, biologically relevant categorization enables stratification for clinical trials and/or targeted therapy, identification of women who are at increased risk of having Lynch syndrome, and may guide clinical management. Cancer 2017;123:802-13. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Cancer, 2017 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Obstetrics and Gynecology
Obstetrics and GynecologyMedicine