PLoS Medicine· 2015Q1
The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) Statement
- 5,372citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2015year
Short summary
The new RECORD statement provides a 13-item checklist to improve the transparency and completeness of reporting for observational studies using routinely collected health data.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Routinely collected health data are increasingly used for research.
- Existing guidelines like STROBE are insufficient for reporting studies using these data.
- The RECORD statement is an extension of STROBE with 13 specific reporting items.
- RECORD covers title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections.
- The statement includes a checklist, explanations, elaborations, and examples of good reporting.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Routinely collected health data, obtained for administrative and clinical purposes without specific a priori research goals, are increasingly used for research. The rapid evolution and availability of these data have revealed issues not addressed by existing reporting guidelines, such as Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE). The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health Data (RECORD) statement was created to fill these gaps. RECORD was created as an extension to the STROBE statement to address reporting items specific to observational studies using routinely collected health data. RECORD consists of a checklist of 13 items related to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion section of articles, and other information required for inclusion in such research reports. This document contains the checklist and explanatory and elaboration information to enhance the use of the checklist. Examples of good reporting for each RECORD checklist item are also included herein. This document, as well as the accompanying website and message board (http://www.record-statement.org), will enhance the implementation and understanding of RECORD. Through implementation of RECORD, authors, journals editors, and peer reviewers can encourage transparency of research reporting.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. PLoS Medicine, 2015 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Oncology
OncologyMedicine