PofoliaShared via Pofolia

British Journal of Sports Medicine· 2013Q1

Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium

Phillip A. Gribble, Eamonn Delahunt, Chris Bleakley, Brian Caulfield et al.

Short summary

The International Ankle Consortium proposes standardized selection criteria for chronic ankle instability (CAI) research to improve evidence generalizability and clinical application.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Inconsistent selection criteria in CAI research limit evidence generalizability.
  • The International Ankle Consortium has developed standardized selection criteria for CAI research.
  • These criteria are based on the best available evidence.
  • The goal is to improve research validity and clinical application.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

While research on chronic ankle instability (CAI) and awareness of its impact on society and health care systems has grown substantially in the last 2 decades, the inconsistency in participant/patient selection criteria across studies presents a potential obstacle to addressing the problem properly. This major gap within the literature limits the ability to generalise this evidence to the target patient population. Therefore, there is a need to provide standards for patient/participant selection criteria in research focused on CAI with justifications using the best available evidence. The International Ankle Consortium provides this position paper to present and discuss an endorsed set of selection criteria for patients with CAI based on the best available evidence to be used in future research and study designs. These recommendations will enhance the validity of research conducted in this clinical population with the end goal of bringing the research evidence to the clinician and patient.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2013 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Orthopedics and Sports MedicineMedicine