PofoliaShared via Pofolia

European Journal of Risk Regulation· 2026Q1

Digital Fairness Act: Mapping the Expectations

Liubomir Nikiforov

Short summary

The Digital Fairness Act (DFA) faces challenges in applying technology-neutral consumer rules to modern digital practices without increasing regulatory fragmentation, according to an analysis combining doctrinal review and stakeholder insights.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • The DFA must navigate applying technology-neutral rules to modern digital choice architectures.
  • Regulatory fragmentation and legal uncertainty are key concerns to avoid.
  • The Act's effectiveness depends on alignment with existing laws, clear definitions, and strong enforcement.
  • Insights are drawn from doctrinal analysis and anonymized 2025 stakeholder discussions.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This paper examines the emerging Digital Fairness Act (DFA) against the development of the EU consumer law safety net, the 2024 Fitness Check and the Consumer Agenda 2030. It explores how EU consumer law should address data-driven commercial practices that leverage digital asymmetries and vulnerabilities without adding to regulatory fragmentation and legal uncertainty. The key challenge is applying technology-neutral consumer rules effectively to modern choice architectures in a way that is sufficiently specific, coherent and, importantly, enforceable. This paper combines doctrinal analysis with insights from anonymised stakeholder discussions held throughout 2025 to outline the key institutional and legislative decisions about the DFA. It also draws on Helberger et al.’s study as a benchmark to assess potential substantive and procedural updates. The paper argues that the value of the DFA largely depends on three factors: its alignment with existing consumer and digital laws, the clarity of definitions such as manipulation, digital asymmetry and contextual vulnerability and, most importantly, the strength of its enforcement mechanisms.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Law

LawSocial Sciences