Synthese· 2026Q1
Does AI undermine democratic deliberation? How engagement algorithms hijack epistemic agency
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
AI engagement algorithms undermine democratic deliberation by hijacking users' epistemic agency, increasing confidence in judgments through cognitive fluency rather than justification, according to a Q1-journal paper.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- AI engagement algorithms, not filter bubbles, fundamentally undermine democratic deliberation.
- These algorithms increase cognitive fluency and metacognitive confidence, mistaken for epistemic justification.
- This process leads to unwarranted confidence in personal judgments and erodes the basis for compromise.
- The paper proposes 'deliberative AI' as a potential solution.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Does artificial intelligence (AI) threaten deliberative democracy? This paper argues that it does, not because it isolates citizens in simplistic “filter bubbles” understood as ideologically homogeneous silos, but because it hijacks the capacities through which beliefs are evaluated. While early accounts emphasized algorithmically induced informational isolation, we argue that the more fundamental mechanism lies in the operation of engagement algorithms that shape how both one’s own views and those of political opponents are evaluated. By optimizing for engagement, these algorithms also optimize the conditions under which information is processed, increasing cognitive fluency and generating metacognitive feelings of confidence that are easily mistaken for epistemic justification. Drawing on research in metacognition and epistemology, we develop a mechanistic account according to which AI-driven engagement architectures reconfigure the cues by which beliefs are evaluated, producing unwarranted confidence in one’s own judgments and undermining the conditions for deliberative compromise. We conclude by outlining how deliberative AI could counteract these effects.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Synthese, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Communication
CommunicationSocial Sciences