PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Antibiotics· 2026Q1

Single-Cell Adhesion, Biofilm Formation, and Disinfectant Susceptibility of Candida albicans on CAD/CAM-Manufactured Occlusal Splint Resins

Laura Beatriz Ribeiro Falconi, Larianne de Sousa Moisés, Sabrina Romão Gonçalves Coelho, João Fernando Carrijo Queiroz et al.

Short summary

A 3D-printed occlusal splint resin showed higher Candida albicans colonization (63.4 x 10^6 CFU/mL) and nanoscale roughness compared to milled (3.9 x 10^5 CFU/mL) and conventional resins, while 2% chlorhexidine effectively eliminated viable cells across all resin types.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 3D-printed resin had the highest surface roughness and microbial load (63.4 x 10^6 CFU/mL) compared to milled (3.9 x 10^5 CFU/mL) and conventional resins.
  • Milled resin showed lower single-cell adhesion forces and energy distributions compared to conventional and 3D-printed resins.
  • 2% Chlorhexidine was the most effective disinfectant, eliminating Colony Forming Units (CFUs) on all tested resins.
  • The 3D-printed resin was more susceptible to microbial colonization and less responsive to disinfectants than the milled resin.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Occlusal splints used for bruxism prevention can accumulate Candida albicans biofilms, highlighting the need to evaluate disinfectant efficacy. Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the nanomechanical properties and nanoadhesion force of C. albicans cells and the efficacy of disinfectant solutions on three occlusal splint resins: 3D Bio-Splint (3D-printed), EvoBlock Monocor (milled), and Vipicril (conventional heat-polymerized resin, control). Methods: Circular specimens (10 × 1.2 mm; n = 60 per resin for the microbiological assays) were polished, immersed in artificial saliva for 56 h, and subjected to 70 brushing cycles to simulate one week of use. After mature C. albicans biofilm formation, specimens were disinfected for 10 min with 0.25% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, sodium perborate (Corega Tabs), 0.1% PHMB, or PBS (control). CFU/mL counts, XTT assay, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analyses were performed. The surface roughness, Young’s modulus, and real-time adhesion of individual C. albicans cells onto the resins were measured by employing an atomic force microscopy (AFM) and AFM-based single-cell force spectroscopy (SCFS) with functionalized C. albicans probes. Results: The 3D-printed resin was the roughest material. Single-cell adhesion was characterized descriptively: the force and energy distributions obtained on the milled resin were shifted towards lower values in all four cell probes, whereas those obtained on the conventional and 3D-printed resins were similar. For biofilm formation, resin type, disinfection protocol, and their interaction significantly affected outcomes (p < 0.001). The printed resin showed the highest microbial load in the control group (63.4 × 106 CFU/mL), whereas the milled resin showed the lowest (3.9 × 105 CFU/mL). Chlorhexidine eliminated CFU counts in all resins, although residual metabolic activity ranged from 10.4% to 40.4%. PHMB on the printed resin showed the greatest discrepancy between residual CFU (4.9% of the control) and cell viability (93.4%), suggesting the persistence of metabolically active cells despite the reduction in cultivable microorganisms. The AFM nanocharacterization showed median Young’s modulus values of 9.92 GPa for the milled resin, 6.44 GPa for the 3D-printed resin, and 4.92 GPa for the conventional resin. Conclusions: The 3D-printed resin showed the highest surface roughness at nanoscale and was more susceptible to microbial colonization than the milled resin and more resistant to the effect of the disinfectants. Chlorhexidine was the most effective disinfectant, since it reduced the CFU to zero and significantly reduced the metabolic activity of C. albicans for all the occlusal splint resins.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Antibiotics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Complementary and Manual Therapy

Complementary and Manual TherapyHealth Professions