PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Review of Development Economics· 2026Q1

Assessing Urban Sustainable Competitiveness and Happiness From the Perspective of Socio‐Economic Environment

Shih‐Yung Chiu, Yung‐ho Chiu, Hsiu‐Chen Huang, Hui-Chen Chien

Short summary

A novel data envelopment analysis framework reveals that persistent economic inefficiency, not environmental or social factors, is the main barrier to sustainable competitiveness in Taiwan's cities (2016-2020).

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • A new DEA framework integrates Shannon entropy to measure sustainability across social, economic, and environmental dimensions, adjusting for undesirable outputs.
  • Persistent inefficiency in the economic subsystem is identified as the main barrier to sustainable competitiveness in Taiwan's cities.
  • Environmental governance and social inclusion show a stronger, more direct relationship with residents' quality of life.
  • Local governance capacity, not regional spillovers, primarily explains differences in quality of life.
  • Smaller, less industrialized jurisdictions frequently outperform major metropolitan areas in sustainable competitiveness.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study examines the sustainable competitiveness of Taiwan's 22 counties and cities between 2016 and 2020. We develop and apply a parallel dynamic two‐stage slacks‐based measure data envelopment analysis framework that integrates Shannon entropy to measure sustainability performance across social, economic, and environmental dimensions, and to evaluate how effectively these outcomes translate into residents' quality of life. Our approach consolidates multiple indicators into subsystem‐specific measures while directionally adjusting for undesirable outputs—such as pollution, waste, and crime—thus ensuring that efficiency estimates fully reflect these critical constraints. The results reveal that persistent inefficiency in the economic subsystem represents the main barrier to sustainable competitiveness. In contrast, environmental governance and social inclusion exhibit a stronger, more direct relationship with well‐being. Spatial regression models further indicate that differences in quality of life are primarily explained by local governance capacity, with limited spillover effects from neighboring regions. A striking finding is that smaller, less industrialized jurisdictions frequently outperform major metropolitan areas, indicating that sustainable competitiveness stems not from administrative scale, but from balanced advancement across all sustainability domains. This study provides an integrated and methodologically consistent framework that helps clarify the linkages between sustainability performance and well‐being. The findings provide empirically grounded insights that can help policymakers promote urban sustainability and contribute to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Review of Development Economics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Management Science and Operations Research

Management Science and Operations ResearchDecision Sciences