PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation· 2026Q1

A Clonidine‐Associated α‐Adrenergic Hypothesis in Sleep Bruxism Pharmacotherapy: An Evidence‐Anchored Target Analysis

Deshui Li, Shanliang Sun, Hui Chen, Xiaojia Ci et al.

Short summary

An evidence-anchored analysis of sleep bruxism (SB) pharmacotherapy reveals a strong signal for alpha-adrenergic receptor targets, particularly those associated with clonidine, suggesting a central arousal-related mechanism rather than a motor or dopamine-driven one.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Alpha-adrenergic receptors (ADRA1A/1B/1D and ADRA2A/2B/2C) are the strongest pharmacodynamic targets associated with effective sleep bruxism (SB) pharmacotherapy.
  • The analysis suggests a central arousal-related mechanism for SB, supported by clonidine's association with effective targets.
  • Dopamine-receptor enrichment was observed in the broader drug target profile but not retained in the efficacy contrast.
  • Levodopa's contribution was linked to GPR143, not direct dopamine-receptor targets.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Sleep bruxism (SB) is a centrally regulated, arousal‐related motor behaviour, but no pharmacotherapy has demonstrated reliable clinical efficacy. This study aimed to identify pathway‐level signals most consistently supported by current polysomnography (PSG)‐based pharmacotherapy evidence for SB. Methods We performed an evidence‐anchored bioinformatic analysis of six drugs evaluated in randomized or controlled. Drugs were classified as effective or not‐supported according to prespecified clinical efficacy criteria. Human pharmacodynamic targets were curated from GtoPdb and DrugBank, with precursor‐derived metabolite targets excluded. Target convergence and Effective‐versus‐Not‐supported contrasts were assessed using enrichment analyses with sensitivity testing across drug classification, enrichment background and retention thresholds. Results Thirty‐one curated pharmacodynamic targets converged on monoaminergic and GABA‐A receptor systems, including adrenergic, dopaminergic, serotonergic and GABA‐A receptor signalling. The Effective‐versus‐Not‐supported contrast retained 14 Effective‐side terms, all driven by α‐adrenergic receptors (ADRA1A/1B/1D and ADRA2A/2B/2C). Dopamine‐receptor enrichment was present in the broader target profile but was not retained in the efficacy contrast. Precursor‐aware curation further showed that levodopa contributed to GPR143 rather than direct dopamine‐receptor targets. Conclusions This efficacy‐anchored analysis generated a clonidine‐associated α‐adrenergic, arousal‐related pharmacological signal within the limited available evidence. The findings are more consistent with a central arousal‐related hypothesis for SB pharmacotherapy than with a single motor‐target or dopamine‐driven treatment model, but require confirmation in contemporary PSG‐based clinical studies and real‐world patient populations.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Complementary and Manual Therapy

Complementary and Manual TherapyHealth Professions