PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Mathematics· 2026Q2

Exact Finite-Population Sequential Auditing for Selective Release from Model-Proposed Candidate Sets

Yusheng Hu, Zhiyuan Zhou, Yongfeng Zhu, Kewei Liang

Short summary

A new risk-constrained audit design precisely controls unsafe-release probability to 3.998% (vs. a 5% limit) across 675 settings, reducing final candidate reviews by 16.55% compared to one-look plans.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Developed a risk-constrained audit design for selective release from model-proposed candidate sets.
  • Max unsafe-release probability was 3.998% across 675 settings, below the 5% limit.
  • In a retrospective analysis, the new plan reduced final candidate reviews by 16.55% compared to a one-look plan.
  • Candidate-level avoidance increased from 34.495% to 45.338%.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Predictive models can rank low-risk cases, but past accuracy cannot establish that skipping review is safe in the current batch. We formulate selective release as a risk-constrained finite-population audit design. A model-proposed candidate and its audit plan are frozen before candidate outcomes are revealed, after which uniform sampling without replacement leads to release, continued review, or full review. Exact hypergeometric recursion verifies the complete policy for every candidate defect total and evaluates its final verification demand. Across 675 generic settings, the maximum unsafe-release probability was 3.998% under a 5% limit. In a retrospective Xili-2026 development population (379,526 alarms; 504 defects), the final candidate covered 14.999% and contained two defects. At the primary 1% released-defect target, the target-specific plan required 16.55% fewer final candidate reviews than a one-look plan selected from the same pre-audit information. Candidate-level avoidance increased from 34.495% to 45.338%, while expected overall reviews avoided increased from 5.174% to 6.800%. These are operating characteristics under audit randomization, not observed factory savings; candidate construction and the conservative adjustment were selected during development.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Mathematics, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Statistics, Probability and UncertaintyDecision Sciences