PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation· 2026Q1

Evaluation of Bite Force Measurements Using Sensor‐Based Systems: A Feasibility Study

Chahak Seth‐Johansen, Carsten Thomsen, Merete Bakke, Klaus Gotfredsen

Short summary

Innobyte and a miniature strain gauge sensor showed high correlation (r=0.73) and agreement in measuring absolute bite force, while the T-Scan system demonstrated greater variability in relative bite force distribution.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Innobyte and a miniature bite force sensor showed significant correlation (r=0.73, R^2=0.53) for absolute bite force measurements.
  • Both Innobyte and the miniature sensor demonstrated high correlation and agreement for relative occlusal force distribution.
  • The T-Scan system exhibited lower agreement and greater variability in relative bite force distribution compared to Innobyte and the miniature sensor.
  • Participants with fewer than 10 functional units showed markedly reduced bite force values with both Innobyte and the miniature sensor.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Digital occlusal analysis systems are increasingly used to assess bite force. However, these systems have not been adequately evaluated. Objectives The purpose of this clinical study was to evaluate bite force recordings obtained with a digital bite force device (Innobyte), a digital occlusal analysis system (T‐Scan) and a miniature, strain gauge, bite force sensor to assess absolute and relative bite force distribution. Methods Twenty‐three healthy adults participated. Dental status, functional units, Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD), Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS‐20) and Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC) were recorded. Bite force was investigated with Innobyte, T‐Scan and a miniature bite force device. Absolute bite force was measured with Innobyte and the miniature bite force sensor and their association was analysed using Pearson correlation. Relative bite force was assessed for all three devices, and the agreement was evaluated using Bland–Altman analysis. Results Absolute bite force recorded by Innobyte correlated significantly with the miniature bite force sensor ( r = 0.73, R 2 = 0.53, p < 0.001). Participants with < 10 functional units exhibited markedly reduced bite force values with both devices. Regarding relative bite force, Innobyte and miniature bite force device demonstrated high correlation and agreement in relative occlusal force distribution, whereas lower agreement was observed in comparisons involving T‐Scan. Conclusions Innobyte and the miniature bite force sensor demonstrated high correlation and agreement in bite force measurements, whereas T‐Scan showed greater variability in relative occlusal force distribution. Device‐specific differences should be considered when interpreting digital occlusal force measurements in clinical practice.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Complementary and Manual Therapy

Complementary and Manual TherapyHealth Professions