Journal of Orthopaedics· 2024Q2
Usefulness of platelet-rich fibrin as a scaffold for meniscal repair: A non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study
- 4citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2024year
Short summary
Meniscal repair surgery augmented with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) significantly improved knee function outcomes in 31 patients over 2 years, though MRI showed no meniscus regeneration.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Meniscal repair surgery using PRF/PRP significantly improved knee function scores in 31 patients over 2 years.
- MRI findings showed no regeneration of the repaired meniscus, but no worsening was observed.
- A secondary finding included the coverage of a traumatic cartilage defect with fibrocartilage-like tissue in one case.
- PRF and PRP used in the study had mean platelet and white blood cell concentrations of approximately 5.5- and 3.6-fold, respectively.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Background: Although regenerative medicine treatment is still in its infancy in Japan, legislation within the past decade has provided opportunities to explore new treatment methods using regenerative medicine. We conducted a 2-year prospective follow-up study to statistically analyze treatment outcomes using platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) as effective scaffolds in meniscal repair.Questions/Purposes.1. Does the use of PRF and PRP for meniscal repair surgery regenerate the meniscus?2. Does augmentation of meniscal repair with PRF effectively improve knee function outcomes? Methods: Thirty-five patients underwent arthroscopic meniscal repair with PRP and PRF using new devices with all-inside techniques. Among these, 31 patients were evaluated for clinical outcomes postoperatively, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings were evaluated. The variables were coded appropriately by creating a new column based on the Kellgren-Lawrence classification over time. Log transformation of different time points (pre, post 6, 12, or 24 months) in relation to Lysholm, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), and Tegner scores were performed. Follow-up arthroscopy using a needle scope was performed in some cases 2 years later. The PRP and PRF used were characterized using the Minimum Information for Studies Evaluating Biologics in Orthopaedics classification. Results: Overall, 31 patients were evaluated (mean age = 39.1 ± 15.7 years; preoperative rehabilitation period = 9.5 ± 7.7 weeks). The PRP had mean platelet and white blood cell concentrations of approximately 5.5- and 3.6-fold, respectively. A significant association existed between sex and deformity deterioration but not in age between the two groups classified by deformity deterioration. Surgical intervention significantly and positively impacted knee function, although no significant changes were found in the activity of the participants over time. MRI findings showed no regeneration of the repaired meniscus; nevertheless, none of them worsened. Furthermore, a case where the traumatic cartilage defect was covered with fibrocartilage-like tissue as a secondary finding was observed. Conclusions: Meniscal repair surgery using PRP/PRF is an effective treatment option for improving knee function in patients with knee deformity. Level of evidence: Level III, Non-randomized controlled cohort/follow-up study.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Orthopaedics, 2024 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Surgery
SurgeryMedicine