PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction· 2026Q2

Bridging Knowledge Gaps in Clinical AI: An Activity Theory Perspective on Interdisciplinary Data Work for Telehealth

Bingsheng Yao, Yao Du, Yue Fu, Xuhai Xu et al.

Short summary

Clinical AI collaborations struggle due to knowledge gaps; shared clinical data and interdisciplinary 'knowledge brokers' can bridge these divides, as shown by Activity Theory analysis of two speech-language pathology AI projects.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Clinical AI development requires effective interdisciplinary collaboration between clinical and technical experts.
  • Knowledge gaps and collaboration tensions are common barriers in these teams.
  • Activity Theory provides a framework to analyze these challenges in clinical AI projects.
  • Shared clinical data can function as boundary objects, and interdisciplinary collaborators as knowledge brokers, to facilitate cooperation.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Advanced AI technologies are increasingly integrated into clinical domains to advance patient care. The design and development of clinical AI technologies necessitate seamless collaboration between clinical and technical experts. However, such interdisciplinary teams are often unsuccessful, with a lack of systematic analysis of collaboration barriers and coping strategies. This work examines two clinical AI collaborations in the context of speech-language pathology via semi-structured interviews with six clinical and seven technical experts. Using Activity Theory (AT) as our analytical lens, we examine persistent knowledge gaps and collaboration tensions across clinical and technical workflows, and show how clinical data can function as boundary objects while interdisciplinary collaborators may act as knowledge brokers to help address these challenges. Our findings contribute to CSCW research on interdisciplinary teams’ data work by showing how shared clinical data, boundary objects, and broker roles shape coordination in early-stage clinical AI collaboration, and by providing insights into best practices for future collaboration.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Management Science and Operations Research

Management Science and Operations ResearchDecision Sciences