PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction· 2026Q2

“Law at Your Fingertips”: Understanding Legal Information Seeking on Video-Sharing Platforms in China

Zhiyang Wu, Junliang Chen, Qian Wan, Qing Xiao et al.

Short summary

Chinese users increasingly turn to video-sharing platforms (VSPs) like Douyin and Bilibili for legal information, finding VSP affordances better meet their needs for emotional support and reduce epistemic discomfort compared to traditional text-based searches.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Chinese users are shifting legal information seeking from text-based platforms to VSPs like Douyin and Bilibili.
  • VSPs better satisfy legal information seekers' needs for emotional support and reduce epistemic discomfort.
  • The study analyzed legal content on two VSPs and interviewed 20 Chinese information seekers.
  • VSP affordances foster trust and engagement in legal knowledge-sharing communities.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Equipping laypeople with the capabilities to seek legal information has been an important goal for Legal Empowerment in modern society. However, unlike general information-seeking behaviors, legal information seeking is characterized by high stakes, urgency, and a critical need for emotional support, which traditional text-based searching platforms struggle to satisfy. In recent years, people have been increasingly turning to Video-Sharing Platforms (VSPs) for access to legal information and to fulfill their legal needs. Despite the importance of this shift, such VSP-mediated legal information-seeking practices remain underexplored. Through an observational analysis of legal content on two VSPs (Douyin and Bilibili) and interviews with 20 Chinese information seekers, this study examined the practices and challenges associated with seeking, comprehending, and evaluating legal information on VSPs. We further revealed the formation of trust and engagement on the VSP-based legal knowledge-sharing community, highlighting how VSP affordances helped mitigate seekers’ epistemic discomfort and satisfy their needs for emotional support. In the discussion, we provided insights on balancing heuristic and systematic processing to encourage information cross-validation, and offered implications for designing trustworthy civic information systems and fostering an accessible, safe, and efficient information-seeking environment in digital space.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Law

LawSocial Sciences