Pediatric Obesity· 2012Q1
Extended international (<scp>IOTF</scp>) body mass index cut‐offs for thinness, overweight and obesity
- 3,164citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2012year
Short summary
New International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) body mass index (BMI) cut-offs, derived from averaged LMS curves across six countries, are virtually identical to the originals (<0.2% prevalence difference) but can now be expressed as specific BMI centiles (e.g., 98.9th for boys' obesity), enabling direct comparison with other references like the WHO standard.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- New IOTF BMI cut-offs are now expressed as specific centiles (e.g., 98.9th for boys' obesity).
- The new cut-offs are virtually identical to the original IOTF cut-offs, with prevalence differences <0.2%.
- Averaging LMS curves from six countries enabled the derivation of these new, comparable cut-offs.
- The new cut-offs allow for easier derivation of thresholds for conditions like morbid obesity (BMI 35).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The international (International Obesity Task Force; IOTF) body mass index (BMI) cut-offs are widely used to assess the prevalence of child overweight, obesity and thinness. Based on data from six countries fitted by the LMS method, they link BMI values at 18 years (16, 17, 18.5, 25 and 30 kg m(-2)) to child centiles, which are averaged across the countries. Unlike other BMI references, e.g. the World Health Organization (WHO) standard, these cut-offs cannot be expressed as centiles (e.g. 85th). METHODS: To address this, we averaged the previously unpublished L, M and S curves for the six countries, and used them to derive new cut-offs defined in terms of the centiles at 18 years corresponding to each BMI value. These new cut-offs were compared with the originals, and with the WHO standard and reference, by measuring their prevalence rates based on US and Chinese data. RESULTS: The new cut-offs were virtually identical to the originals, giving prevalence rates differing by < 0.2% on average. The discrepancies were smaller for overweight and obesity than for thinness. The international and WHO prevalences were systematically different before/after age 5. CONCLUSIONS: Defining the international cut-offs in terms of the underlying LMS curves has several benefits. New cut-offs are easy to derive (e.g. BMI 35 for morbid obesity), and they can be expressed as BMI centiles (e.g. boys obesity = 98.9th centile), allowing them to be compared with other BMI references. For WHO, median BMI is relatively low in early life and high at older ages, probably due to its method of construction.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Pediatric Obesity, 2012 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthMedicine