PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Oxford Journal of Archaeology· 2026Q1

MINDING THE GAP: A METHODOLOGICAL AND CHRONOLOGICAL REASSESSMENT OF EASTERN MEDITERRANEAN PURPLE‐DYE PRODUCTION IN THE BRONZE AND IRON AGES

Golan Shalvi

Short summary

A 300-year 'gap' (c. 950–650 BC) in Eastern Mediterranean purple dye production, identified by new granular criteria, suggests a shift from dispersed crafts to centralized, state-controlled production, first seen at Tel Shiqmona.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • New granular criteria for identifying purple dye production sites have been established.
  • A 300-year 'gap' (c. 950–650 BC) in production evidence was identified across the Eastern Mediterranean.
  • Tel Shiqmona is the only site with significant production evidence during this gap.
  • The gap likely represents a shift to centralized, state-controlled production, starting at Shiqmona in the 9th century BC.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Summary Purple dye was an iconic status symbol in the ancient Mediterranean, yet tracing the expansion and shift of production from the Aegean to the Levant encounters substantial methodological difficulties. Using Tel Shiqmona – a unique industrial centre with a continuous Iron Age sequence – as an archaeological benchmark, this study defines detailed and granular criteria for identifying production. Applying these criteria reveals a 300‐year ‘gap’ ( c .950–650 BC), when Shiqmona remains the sole site with significant production evidence. This paper argues the gap represents a consolidation: a shift from dispersed crafts into centralized, state‐controlled production, first attested at Shiqmona in the ninth century BC. By providing a chronologically sensitive database for the Levant, this study lays foundations for examining broader Mediterranean‐wide trajectories. The centralized and specialized production attested at Shiqmona offers a plausible template for understanding the industry’s seventh century BC resurgence in the Levant, as the wider adoption of the ‘Shiqmona model’ under Neo‐Assyrian hegemony.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Oxford Journal of Archaeology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Archeology (Arts and Humanities)

ArcheologyArts and Humanities