PofoliaShared via Pofolia

ACM Computing Surveys· 2025Q1· Review

Natural Language Processing for the Legal Domain: A Survey of Tasks, Datasets, Models, and Challenges

Farid Ariai, Joel Mackenzie, Gianluca Demartini

Short summary

A survey of 131 studies reveals NLP's growing impact on legal processes, highlighting tasks like document summarization and named entity recognition, and identifying 16 key research challenges including bias mitigation and model interpretability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • 131 studies were reviewed to survey NLP applications in the legal domain.
  • Key legal NLP tasks include Document Summarisation, Named Entity Recognition, Question Answering, Argument Mining, Text Classification, and Judgment Prediction.
  • Challenges in legal NLP include document length, complex language, and limited open datasets.
  • 16 open research challenges were identified, such as bias detection, model interpretability, and explainability.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is revolutionising the way both professionals and laypersons operate in the legal field. The considerable potential for NLP in the legal sector, especially in developing computational assistance tools for various legal processes, has captured the interest of researchers for years. This survey follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework, reviewing 154 studies, with a final selection of 131 after manual filtering. It explores foundational concepts related to NLP in the legal domain, illustrating the unique aspects and challenges of processing legal texts, such as extensive document lengths, complex language, and limited open legal datasets. We provide an overview of NLP tasks specific to legal text, such as Document Summarisation, Named Entity Recognition, Question Answering, Argument Mining, Text Classification, and Judgment Prediction. Furthermore, we analyse both developed legal-oriented language models, and approaches for adapting general-purpose language models to the legal domain. Additionally, we identify sixteen open research challenges, including the detection and mitigation of bias in artificial intelligence applications, the need for more robust and interpretable models, and improving explainability to handle the complexities of legal language and reasoning.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. ACM Computing Surveys, 2025 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Political Science and International Relations

Political Science and International RelationsSocial Sciences