PofoliaPofolia ile paylaşıldı

New England Journal of Medicine· 2015Q1· Klinik çalışma

İleri Evre Renal Hücreli Karsinomda Nivolumab ve Everolimus Karşılaştırması

Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Robert J. Motzer, Bernard Escudier, Ray McDermott, Saby George ve diğerleri

Kısa özet

Daha önce tedavi görmüş ileri evre böbrek kanseri hastalarında nivolumab, everolimus'a kıyasla medyan genel sağkalımı anlamlı şekilde 5.4 ay iyileştirmiştir.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Ana noktalar

  • Nivolumab, everolimus'a kıyasla medyan genel sağkalımı 25.0 aya uzatmıştır (everolimus için 19.6 ay).
  • Nivolumab ile objektif yanıt oranı, everolimus'a göre 5.98 kat daha yüksekti (%25'e karşı %5).
  • Nivolumab alan hastalarda (%19) derece 3 veya 4 yan etkiler, everolimus alanlara göre (%37) daha az sıklıkta görüldü.
  • Nivolumab'ın everolimus'a karşı ölüm tehlike oranı 0.73 olarak bulundu ve üstünlük için belirlenen ön şartı karşıladı.

Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.

Özet (abstract)

BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor, was associated with encouraging overall survival in uncontrolled studies involving previously treated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 study compared nivolumab with everolimus in patients with renal-cell carcinoma who had received previous treatment. METHODS: A total of 821 patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma for which they had received previous treatment with one or two regimens of antiangiogenic therapy were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive 3 mg of nivolumab per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 2 weeks or a 10-mg everolimus tablet orally once daily. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points included the objective response rate and safety. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 25.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8 to not estimable) with nivolumab and 19.6 months (95% CI, 17.6 to 23.1) with everolimus. The hazard ratio for death with nivolumab versus everolimus was 0.73 (98.5% CI, 0.57 to 0.93; P=0.002), which met the prespecified criterion for superiority (P≤0.0148). The objective response rate was greater with nivolumab than with everolimus (25% vs. 5%; odds ratio, 5.98 [95% CI, 3.68 to 9.72]; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.4) with nivolumab and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.5) with everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.03; P=0.11). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19% of the patients receiving nivolumab and in 37% of the patients receiving everolimus; the most common event with nivolumab was fatigue (in 2% of the patients), and the most common event with everolimus was anemia (in 8%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with previously treated advanced renal-cell carcinoma, overall survival was longer and fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred with nivolumab than with everolimus. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 025 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01668784.).

Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015 · DOI ↗

ÇıkarımlarPremium
Makaleye SorÜcretsiz hesapla

Ücretsiz hesapla devam et

Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.

Web'de ücretsiz devam et

Google ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.

Telefonda:

Alan: Göğüs ve Solunum Tıbbı

Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineMedicine