New England Journal of Medicine· 2015Q1· Klinik çalışma
İleri Evre Renal Hücreli Karsinomda Nivolumab ve Everolimus Karşılaştırması
Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma
- 5.913atıf
- Q1SCImago
- 2015yıl
Kısa özet
Daha önce tedavi görmüş ileri evre böbrek kanseri hastalarında nivolumab, everolimus'a kıyasla medyan genel sağkalımı anlamlı şekilde 5.4 ay iyileştirmiştir.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Ana noktalar
- Nivolumab, everolimus'a kıyasla medyan genel sağkalımı 25.0 aya uzatmıştır (everolimus için 19.6 ay).
- Nivolumab ile objektif yanıt oranı, everolimus'a göre 5.98 kat daha yüksekti (%25'e karşı %5).
- Nivolumab alan hastalarda (%19) derece 3 veya 4 yan etkiler, everolimus alanlara göre (%37) daha az sıklıkta görüldü.
- Nivolumab'ın everolimus'a karşı ölüm tehlike oranı 0.73 olarak bulundu ve üstünlük için belirlenen ön şartı karşıladı.
Yapay zekâ ile başlık ve abstract'tan üretildi; tam metin okunmaz.
Özet (abstract)
BACKGROUND: Nivolumab, a programmed death 1 (PD-1) checkpoint inhibitor, was associated with encouraging overall survival in uncontrolled studies involving previously treated patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma. This randomized, open-label, phase 3 study compared nivolumab with everolimus in patients with renal-cell carcinoma who had received previous treatment. METHODS: A total of 821 patients with advanced clear-cell renal-cell carcinoma for which they had received previous treatment with one or two regimens of antiangiogenic therapy were randomly assigned (in a 1:1 ratio) to receive 3 mg of nivolumab per kilogram of body weight intravenously every 2 weeks or a 10-mg everolimus tablet orally once daily. The primary end point was overall survival. The secondary end points included the objective response rate and safety. RESULTS: The median overall survival was 25.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 21.8 to not estimable) with nivolumab and 19.6 months (95% CI, 17.6 to 23.1) with everolimus. The hazard ratio for death with nivolumab versus everolimus was 0.73 (98.5% CI, 0.57 to 0.93; P=0.002), which met the prespecified criterion for superiority (P≤0.0148). The objective response rate was greater with nivolumab than with everolimus (25% vs. 5%; odds ratio, 5.98 [95% CI, 3.68 to 9.72]; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.4) with nivolumab and 4.4 months (95% CI, 3.7 to 5.5) with everolimus (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.03; P=0.11). Grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 19% of the patients receiving nivolumab and in 37% of the patients receiving everolimus; the most common event with nivolumab was fatigue (in 2% of the patients), and the most common event with everolimus was anemia (in 8%). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with previously treated advanced renal-cell carcinoma, overall survival was longer and fewer grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred with nivolumab than with everolimus. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 025 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01668784.).
Yazarların özeti; kaynağından alınmıştır. New England Journal of Medicine, 2015 · DOI ↗
Ücretsiz hesapla devam et
Makaleye Sor ile bu makaleye günde 3 soru ücretsiz; makaleyi kaydet, kaynakçasını al, ilgi alanına göre her gün yeni özetler. Çıkarımlar Premium.
Web'de ücretsiz devam etGoogle ya da Apple hesabınla giriş; kart istemez. Bu makaleye geri dönersin.
Telefonda:
Alan: Göğüs ve Solunum Tıbbı
Pulmonary and Respiratory MedicineMedicine