PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Journal of Petrology· 2026Q1

Zircon geochronology constraints on the geometry and solidification timescales of the Dufek layered mafic intrusion, Antarctica

Jill A VanTongeren, Dawid Szymanowski, Aidan Taylor, Blair Schoene

Short summary

Zircon U-Pb ages from Antarctica's Dufek Intrusion suggest most zircons crystallized from interstitial melt within cumulate mush, not the main magma, complicating emplacement models.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Most zircons in the Dufek Intrusion crystallized from interstitial melt within the cumulate mush, not the primary magma.
  • Zircon cooling ages are consistent with conductive cooling of a single 6–7 km thick magma chamber.
  • The Forrestal Range and Dufek Massif exposures likely originated as a single magma chamber, now separated by a buried fault.
  • Geophysical models of two separate intrusions cannot be ruled out by the zircon cooling data alone.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract The ~ 182 Ma Dufek Intrusion of Antarctica, associated with the Ferrar Dolerite Province, is a large layered mafic intrusion that is estimated to be similar in size to the 8–9 km thick Bushveld Complex of South Africa. Similar to the Bushveld Complex, the Dufek Intrusion displays a consistent stratigraphic progression of fractional crystallization all the way to the roof of the intrusion and contact with overlying granophyre. In this study, we test competing hypotheses for the ‘big tank’ vs. ‘out-of-sequence emplacement’ models for layered intrusions by presenting high precision CA-ID-TIMS zircon U–Pb ages, zircon εHf, and zircon trace element compositions of 10 samples from across the two outcrop exposure regions (the upper Forrestal Range and lower Dufek Massif) that represent the Dufek Intrusion stratigraphy. Our results suggest that the majority of zircon found in the Dufek Intrusion, and by inference many other layered mafic intrusions, is crystallized from the interstitial melt within the cumulate mush and cannot be used to reconstruct emplacement style or high temperature crystallization of the original magma. Cooling durations to the 800°C isotherm recorded by the zircons are consistent with 1D thermal modeling of conductive cooling of a single 6–7 km thick magma chamber emplaced in the shallow crust, but cannot rule out their formation as two separate intrusions as previously proposed on the basis of geophysics. Given the similarity of ages, geochemistry, and outcrop dip, we propose that the Forrestal Range and Dufek Massif exposures originally formed as a single magma chamber, but are now separated by a fault buried beneath the Sallee Snowfield, with limited missing stratigraphy between them.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Journal of Petrology, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

GeophysicsEarth and Planetary Sciences