Natural Language & Linguistic Theory· 2026Q1
Unearthing adjectives in Wolof: Lexical categories and typological implications
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Wolof property predicates like 'be black' are derived from an underlying adjectival category, not verbs, evidenced by a specific relative construction characteristic of attributive adjectives.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Wolof property predicates originate from an underlying adjectival category.
- A specific relative construction supports the adjectival origin, showing optional nonintersective and noncontrastive semantics.
- The analysis proposes adjectives merge with nouns and are embedded under a functional 'Pred' head.
- Adjectives surface as verbs due to raising and fusion with the 'Pred' head.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract It is widely assumed that Wolof lacks adjectives, encoding property predicates as verbs (e.g., ñuul ‘be black’). This paper argues instead that these property predicates are derived from an underlying adjectival category. Evidence comes from a relative construction restricted to property predicates, whose optional nonintersective and noncontrastive semantics are characteristic of attributive adjectives. Building on Baker’s (2003b) seminal proposals for Choctaw and Mohawk, the analysis proposes that these predicates originate as attributive adjectives merged with the noun, but in Wolof must subsequently be embedded under the functional head Pred. The adjectival head a raises to and fuses with Pred, causing adjectives to surface as verbs. More broadly, the paper argues for the universality of both Pred and the adjective category, with crosslinguistic variation in the expression of property predicates and the availability of copulas arising from language-specific properties of their interaction.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Language and Linguistics
Language and LinguisticsArts and Humanities