PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Scientific Reports· 2026Q1

Spatio-temporal distribution and influencing factors of tangible cultural heritage along the Grand Canal of China

Huiping Geng, Leshan Cai, Manguo Geng

Short summary

Tangible Cultural Heritage (TCH) sites along China's Grand Canal show a historical peak during the Ming and Qing dynasties, with a spatial pattern of "axis continuity, nodal clustering, and peripheral diffusion" and major concentrations in Beijing-Tianjin, Zhengzhou-Luoyang, and Suzhou-Hangzhou.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • TCH sites along the Grand Canal peaked in number during the Ming and Qing dynasties.
  • The spatial distribution follows a "axis continuity, nodal clustering, and peripheral diffusion" pattern.
  • Major concentration areas for TCH include Beijing-Tianjin, Zhengzhou-Luoyang, and Suzhou-Hangzhou.
  • Natural geographical conditions are the most significant factor influencing TCH distribution, followed by historical and socio-cultural processes.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

The Grand Canal in China (GCC), representing a state-engineered linear water system at a national scale, is distinct from river systems formed through natural geomorphological and hydrological processes, having evolved into a distinctive heritage corridor through long-term transport organization, state governance, and cultural transmission. However, previous studies have largely been conducted at the level of administrative units or localized segments, focusing more on the attributes of individual heritage sites than on the corridor-scale continuity, temporality, and spatial-organizational functions of the GCC. Therefore, focusing on 918 nationally protected Tangible Cultural Heritage (TCH) sites located within cities along the GCC corridor, this study examines their spatiotemporal patterns and spatial associations with geographical and historical factors using the average nearest neighbor index, kernel density estimation, standard deviation ellipse, spatial overlay analysis, and historical document analysis. The results indicate that (1) The number of TCH sites exhibits a staged trajectory characterized by an initial decline, subsequent growth to a peak during the Ming and Qing dynasties, and a decline in the modern and contemporary period. (2) Spatially, a pattern characterized by “axis continuity, nodal clustering, and peripheral diffusion” has formed, with Beijing-Tianjin, Zhengzhou-Luoyang, and Suzhou-Hangzhou emerging as major concentration areas. (3) From a historical perspective, TCH follows a developmental path characterized by “midstream origin, north-south expansion, dual-core formation, and northward intensification”. (4) Natural geographical conditions show the strongest and most consistent association with the distribution of TCH, while historical and socio-cultural processes are associated with further differentiation and accumulation of TCH in core sections. The findings contribute to understanding the spatial evolution of linear heritage corridors and provide empirical evidence for integrated conservation planning of the GCC.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Scientific Reports, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Space and Planetary ScienceEarth and Planetary Sciences