Production Engineering· 2026Q2
Transparent cost analysis of hollow embossing rolling vs. hollow embossing for industrial BPHP production
- 0citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Continuous hollow embossing rolling (HER) reduces manufacturing costs per metallic bipolar half plate (BPHP) by up to 39% compared to conventional hollow embossing (HE).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Continuous hollow embossing rolling (HER) reduces BPHP manufacturing costs by up to 39% compared to conventional hollow embossing (HE).
- A cost modeling framework integrates investment, tooling, machine, and material costs based on industrial practice.
- HER demonstrates a robust cost advantage, with total cost reductions of 23% to 37% across investigated scenarios.
- The study provides a transferable methodology for economic evaluation of forming processes in industrial settings.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Abstract Metallic bipolar half plates (BPHPs) represent a major cost driver in fuel cell and electrolyzer systems, making cost-efficient high-rate manufacturing essential for industrial deployment. This study presents a transparent and industrially grounded cost modelling framework for the systematic comparison of two forming technologies: conventional hollow embossing (HE) and continuous hollow embossing rolling (HER). Based on a uniform reference production scenario, the model integrates investment, tooling, machine, and material costs, explicitly considering production rates, tool life, overall equipment effectiveness, and process-specific boundary conditions based on cost data derived from industrial practice and equipment procurement experience. In addition to a detailed cost structure analysis, comprehensive sensitivity and scenario analyses are performed to assess the robustness of the results against uncertainties in key parameters. The results show that HER provides substantial economic advantages, reducing manufacturing costs per BPHP by up to 39 % and total costs by approximately 28 % in the reference case. Across all investigated scenarios, HER demonstrates a robust cost advantage, with expected total cost reductions in the range of 23 % to 37 % compared to HE. The study contributes a transferable methodology for the economic evaluation of alternative forming processes under industrial conditions and provides a quantitative basis for decision-making in large-scale production system design for fuel cell components.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Production Engineering, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Mechanical Engineering
Mechanical EngineeringEngineering