Drugs· 2026Q1· Review
Personalized Treatment of Hemophilia: Matching Therapies to Patient Needs in a Rapidly Evolving Landscape
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
A new decision framework helps personalize hemophilia treatment by integrating clinical indications and patient-specific factors with novel therapies like EHL concentrates, non-factor agents, and gene therapy.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Novel hemophilia therapies include extended half-life (EHL) factor concentrates, non-factor therapies, hemostasis-rebalancing agents, and gene therapy.
- A practical decision framework integrates clinical indications (prophylaxis, bleeding, surgery) with patient modifiers (age, lifestyle, inhibitors, comorbidities).
- Factor replacement is key for acute bleeding and surgery, while non-factor and rebalancing therapies offer low-burden prophylaxis.
- Gene therapy shows more durable results in hemophilia B than hemophilia A.
- Direct comparisons between treatment classes are limited, emphasizing the need for individualized treatment selection.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
The therapeutic landscape of hemophilia, a rare inherited bleeding disorder, has rapidly evolved, introducing several novel modalities: extended half-life (EHL) coagulation factor concentrates, non-factor therapies, hemostasis-rebalancing agents, and gene therapy. These advances have improved clinical outcomes by reducing bleeding and treatment burden. However, individualizing treatment in routine practice has become more complex. This narrative review aims to provide a practical summary of available treatment options for pharmacologists, policymakers, and other readers who are not hemophilia specialists. A practical decision framework integrates available data with the clinical indication (regular prophylaxis, management of breakthrough bleeding, and perioperative care), patient-specific modifiers (age, lifestyle, inhibitor status, venous access, joint phenotype, comorbidities, and thrombosis risk). Drug therapies are discussed according to clinical evidence, including pivotal phase 3 trials, long-term extension studies, real-world data, and late-stage development programs. Factor replacement remains critical for hemostatic control during acute bleeding, surgery, and other interventions where predictable and measurable exposure is needed, whereas non-factor and rebalancing therapies provide low-burden prophylactic alternatives with distinct safety profiles and monitoring challenges. Direct comparisons between treatment classes are limited, making treatment individualization essential. Gene therapy has demonstrated more durable outcomes in hemophilia B than in hemophilia A. This review supports shared decision-making and individualized treatment selection in modern hemophilia care. While clinical trial evidence is limited by the scarcity of head-to-head comparisons and incomplete integration of real-world determinants, registry data collection will be essential.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Drugs, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Hematology
HematologyMedicine