PofoliaShared via Pofolia

Conflict and Health· 2026Q1

Drivers of perceived healthcare service quality among healthcare workers in TQM-implementing hospitals in conflict-affected yemen: a cross-sectional study

Gobran Mohammed Alsalit, منير الوصابي, Haitham Mohammed Jowah

Short summary

In Yemeni hospitals implementing Total Quality Management (TQM), processes (β=0.458), policy/strategy (β=0.283), and partnerships/resources (β=0.144) significantly predicted higher perceived service quality among staff.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • Processes (β=0.458), policy and strategy (β=0.283), and partnerships and resources (β=0.144) were significant positive predictors of perceived healthcare service quality.
  • Leadership commitment showed no significant direct association with service quality, but its effect was largely mediated through processes (82.4%) and policy and strategy (79.7%).
  • Gender significantly moderated TQM-quality relationships, with steeper slopes observed among female staff.
  • Overall TQM implementation (median=5.48) and perceived service quality (median=5.82) were rated relatively high on a 7-point scale.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract Background Healthcare systems in protracted conflicts face compounded pressures that challenge service quality. In 2021, Yemen’s Ministry of Public Health mandated the implementation of total quality management (TQM) across hospitals. This cross-sectional study examined the association between TQM implementation and perceived healthcare service quality from the provider’s perspective, framing the findings as hypothesis-generating rather than causal. Methods A total of 410 healthcare professionals from four TQM-implementing hospitals in Sana’a completed a validated questionnaire measuring five European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM)-based TQM dimensions and five SERVQUAL-adapted provider proxy service quality dimensions. Multiple linear regression with robust standard errors (Huber–White), bootstrap mediation, and moderated regression were used in the analysis. Results Perceived TQM implementation and service quality were rated relatively high on a 7-point scale (overall TQM median = 5.48, IQR = 1.28; overall perceived service quality median = 5.82, IQR = 1.39). The multiple linear regression model was statistically significant (R² = 0.651, F(5, 404) = 102.22, p < .001). Processes (β = 0.458, 95% CI [0.269, 0.647], p < .001), policy and strategy (β = 0.283, 95% CI [0.129, 0.438], p < .001), and partnerships and resources (β = 0.144, 95% CI [0.041, 0.246], p = .006) were significant positive predictors of perceived service quality. Leadership commitment showed no significant direct association (β = 0.009, p = .873); post-hoc mediation indicated that its effect on service quality operated largely through processes (indirect effect = 0.506, 95% CI [0.412, 0.617], 82.4% mediated) and policy and strategy (indirect effect = 0.489, 95% CI [0.384, 0.605], 79.7% mediated). Human resources showed a marginally significant negative trend (β = −0.089, 95% CI [− 0.179, 0.001], p = .051). Gender significantly moderated four of the five relationships (all p < .05), with steeper TQM–quality slopes among female than among male staff (e.g., processes: β = 0.843, 95% CI [0.771, 0.915] vs. 0.625, 95% CI [0.515, 0.736]), whereas experience was not significant. Conclusions Process-oriented, policy-oriented, and partnership-oriented TQM dimensions were positively associated with perceived service quality in this conflict-affected setting, whereas leadership influence appeared indirect. These cross-sectional, provider-reported findings generate hypotheses for future longitudinal and mixed-methods research incorporating patient-reported outcomes and objective clinical indicators.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Conflict and Health, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health

Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child HealthMedicine