· 2019
CheXpert: A Large Chest Radiograph Dataset with Uncertainty Labels and Expert Comparison
- 2,589citations
- 2019year
Short summary
CheXpert, a dataset of 224,316 chest radiographs, introduces uncertainty labels to capture ambiguity in radiograph interpretation, enabling CNNs to outperform radiologists on detecting cardiomegaly, edema, and pleural effusion.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- CheXpert dataset contains 224,316 chest radiographs from 65,240 patients.
- A novel labeler automatically detects 14 observations and their uncertainties from radiology reports.
- CNNs trained with uncertainty labels outperformed three radiologists on detecting cardiomegaly, edema, and pleural effusion.
- The dataset is released as a public benchmark for chest radiograph interpretation models.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Large, labeled datasets have driven deep learning methods to achieve expert-level performance on a variety of medical imaging tasks. We present CheXpert, a large dataset that contains 224,316 chest radiographs of 65,240 patients. We design a labeler to automatically detect the presence of 14 observations in radiology reports, capturing uncertainties inherent in radiograph interpretation. We investigate different approaches to using the uncertainty labels for training convolutional neural networks that output the probability of these observations given the available frontal and lateral radiographs. On a validation set of 200 chest radiographic studies which were manually annotated by 3 board-certified radiologists, we find that different uncertainty approaches are useful for different pathologies. We then evaluate our best model on a test set composed of 500 chest radiographic studies annotated by a consensus of 5 board-certified radiologists, and compare the performance of our model to that of 3 additional radiologists in the detection of 5 selected pathologies. On Cardiomegaly, Edema, and Pleural Effusion, the model ROC and PR curves lie above all 3 radiologist operating points. We release the dataset to the public as a standard benchmark to evaluate performance of chest radiograph interpretation models.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source., 2019 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingMedicine