PofoliaShared via Pofolia

International Journal of Urban and Regional Research· 2026Q1

THE CITY AS CODE : Assemblage, Surveillance, and Algorithmic Rule in London

Huaxiong Jiang

Short summary

London exemplifies a 'Subjugating City' where algorithmic statecraft has created 'resilient control' over four decades by integrating surveillance infrastructure and absorbing democratic challenges.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Key points

  • London's governance has evolved into a distributed surveillance assemblage over four decades.
  • Algorithmic statecraft produces 'resilient control' by absorbing democratic contestation.
  • Key parameters include dual policy logic, hybrid public-private infrastructure, and adaptive governance.
  • Technological path dependency and corporate secrecy stabilize governance power.

AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.

Abstract

Abstract This article theorizes London as an illustrative ‘Subjugating City’, where urban governance has evolved over four decades into a distributed surveillance assemblage. Moving beyond fragmented critiques of individual technologies, it examines how algorithmic statecraft produces ‘resilient control’, a mode of governance that preserves its core logic by absorbing and reorganizing democratic contestation. Specifically, the London example operates through three key parameters: a dual policy logic balancing pro‐innovation narratives with intrusive legal data extraction mandates; a hybrid public‐private infrastructure integrating national databases with corporate analytics; and an adaptive governance design that internalizes legal and social friction. Through analysis of London's layered surveillance infrastructure—from the ‘Ring of Steel’ and national Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) systems to the privatization of state functions through partnerships such as National Health Service (NHS)–Palantir—the article demonstrates how governance power is stabilized through technological path dependency and corporate secrecy. Rather than positing an easily transferable or universally reproducible model, the article treats London as a rich empirical example that highlights how liberal democratic institutions normalize expansive surveillance while maintaining the appearance of accountability and public consent across neoliberal urban spaces.

The authors' abstract, as published at the source. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2026 · DOI ↗

TakeawaysPremium
Ask the paperFree account

Continue with a free account

Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.

Continue free on the web

Sign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.

On your phone:

Field: Urban Studies

Urban StudiesSocial Sciences