IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging· 2018Q1
Deep Learning Techniques for Automatic MRI Cardiac Multi-Structures Segmentation and Diagnosis: Is the Problem Solved?
- 2,285citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2018year
Short summary
Deep learning methods achieved expert-level accuracy (0.97 correlation for index extraction, 0.96 for diagnosis) on the new Automatic Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge (ACDC) dataset, suggesting automation is near for cardiac MRI analysis.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Introduced the Automatic Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge (ACDC) dataset, comprising 150 CMR recordings with expert annotations.
- Evaluated deep learning methods from nine research groups for segmentation and four for classification tasks.
- Best deep learning methods achieved a 0.97 correlation for automatic clinical index extraction and 0.96 accuracy for automatic diagnosis.
- Results suggest deep learning can faithfully reproduce expert analysis for cardiac MRI assessment.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Delineation of the left ventricular cavity, myocardium, and right ventricle from cardiac magnetic resonance images (multi-slice 2-D cine MRI) is a common clinical task to establish diagnosis. The automation of the corresponding tasks has thus been the subject of intense research over the past decades. In this paper, we introduce the "Automatic Cardiac Diagnosis Challenge" dataset (ACDC), the largest publicly available and fully annotated dataset for the purpose of cardiac MRI (CMR) assessment. The dataset contains data from 150 multi-equipments CMRI recordings with reference measurements and classification from two medical experts. The overarching objective of this paper is to measure how far state-of-the-art deep learning methods can go at assessing CMRI, i.e., segmenting the myocardium and the two ventricles as well as classifying pathologies. In the wake of the 2017 MICCAI-ACDC challenge, we report results from deep learning methods provided by nine research groups for the segmentation task and four groups for the classification task. Results show that the best methods faithfully reproduce the expert analysis, leading to a mean value of 0.97 correlation score for the automatic extraction of clinical indices and an accuracy of 0.96 for automatic diagnosis. These results clearly open the door to highly accurate and fully automatic analysis of cardiac CMRI. We also identify scenarios for which deep learning methods are still failing. Both the dataset and detailed results are publicly available online, while the platform will remain open for new submissions.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2018 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and ImagingMedicine