Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts· 2016Q1
Dissecting an earworm: Melodic features and song popularity predict involuntary musical imagery.
- 81citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2016year
Short summary
Songs with greater chart success and more recent chart runs are more likely to become involuntary musical imagery (earworms).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Songs with higher chart success and recent chart presence are more likely to become earworms.
- Earworm melodies exhibit more common global contours compared to non-earworm melodies.
- Earworm tunes have less common average gradients between melodic turning points than non-earworm tunes.
- Earworm tunes generally have faster average tempi than non-earworm tunes.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Involuntary musical imagery (INMI or “earworms”)—the spontaneous recall and repeating of a tune in one’s mind—can be attributed to a wide range of triggers, including memory associations and recent musical exposure. The present study examined whether a song’s popularity and melodic features might also help to explain whether it becomes INMI, using a dataset of tunes that were named as INMI by 3,000 survey participants. It was found that songs that had achieved greater success and more recent runs in the U.K. music charts were reported more frequently as INMI. A set of 100 of these frequently named INMI tunes was then matched to 100 tunes never named as INMI by the survey participants, in terms of popularity and song style. These 2 groups of tunes were compared using 83 statistical summary and corpus-based melodic features and automated classification techniques. INMI tunes were found to have more common global melodic contours and less common average gradients between melodic turning points than non-INMI tunes, in relation to a large pop music corpus. INMI tunes also displayed faster average tempi than non-INMI tunes. Results are discussed in relation to literature on INMI, musical memory, and melodic “catchiness.”
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Psychology of Aesthetics Creativity and the Arts, 2016 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive NeuroscienceNeuroscience