BMC Oral Health· 2026Q1
CBCT-based posterior maxillary morphometry of the maxillary tuberosity and cortical bone thickness in the third-molar region
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
CBCT scans reveal consistent posterior maxillary anatomy around erupted third molars, showing a thinner buccal cortex (0.9-1.2mm) and stable tuberosity dimensions (width 16-18mm, height 10-12mm, length 12-14mm) across 120 adults (≥25 years).
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Buccal cortical bone in the posterior maxilla is consistently thinner (0.9-1.2mm) than palatal bone.
- Maxillary tuberosity dimensions (width 16-18mm, height 10-12mm, length 12-14mm) are stable and not sex-dependent.
- Buccal cortical bone thickness showed significant differences across age groups on the right side (p=0.012).
- Root morphology and tuberosity dimensions showed limited associations.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Fractures involving the maxillary tuberosity and buccal cortical bone represent notable complications during maxillary third-molar extraction and may be influenced by anatomical characteristics of the posterior maxilla. This study aimed to evaluate maxillary tuberosity dimensions, buccal and palatal cortical bone thickness, and their associations with the anatomical characteristics of erupted maxillary third molars using CBCT. This retrospective study analyzed CBCT scans of adults aged ≥ 25 years presenting with fully erupted maxillary third molars. Maxillary tuberosity width, height, and length were measured at standardized intervals, and buccal and palatal cortical bone thickness were recorded at predefined reference levels. Mesiodistal crown width, root number, and root length were also assessed. Statistical analyses included Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis, and Spearman’s rank correlation tests. A total of 120 patients (57.5% female; mean age 35.06 ± 7.13 years) were included. Cortical bone thickness measurements demonstrated minor side-related differences, with palatal cortical bone thickness exceeding buccal thickness on the right side and comparable values observed on the left side. Buccal cortical bone thickness differed significantly across age groups on the right side ( p = 0.012). Tuberosity dimensions did not differ significantly according to sex or side. Root morphology showed no significant association with cortical bone thickness or tuberosity measurements. Tuberosity height displayed weak positive correlations with certain root-length parameters, while buccal cortical bone thickness showed limited associations with tuberosity dimensions. The posterior maxilla demonstrates consistent morphometric patterns around erupted third molars, including a relatively thinner buccal cortex and stable tuberosity dimensions. These findings provide CBCT-based anatomical reference data regarding posterior maxillary morphology.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Oral Health, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Oral Surgery
Oral SurgeryDentistry