BMC Oral Health· 2026Q1
Implant prosthetic emergence angle and its association with peri-implant health and disease
- 0citations
- Q1SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Dental implants with emergence angles (EA) greater than 30° are independently associated with a higher risk of peri-implantitis, even after accounting for soft tissue characteristics and plaque accumulation.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Emergence angles (EA) greater than 30° were significantly associated with peri-implantitis (p=0.001).
- Wide EAs (>30°) independently predicted greater probing depth, clinical attachment level, and gingival index.
- EA was the sole independent factor associated with peri-implantitis after adjusting for soft tissue characteristics and plaque.
- The peri-implantitis group exhibited the largest mean EA.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Dental implants can be affected by peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis. Plaque control and appropriate prosthetic design may help maintain peri-implant health. Excessively large emergence angles (EA) may increase the association with peri-implantitis, depending on the implant crown angle. This study examined how the implant EA associates with peri-implant health, disease, and tissue. The study was conducted in the Faculty of Dentistry, Division of Periodontology, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University. Eighty-eight patients aged 18–70 years (213 dental implants) with high-quality panoramic radiographs. Patients with implants that had been in function with their definitive prosthetic restorations between 1 and 5 years were included in the study. According to the 2017 AAP/EFP World Workshop on Classification of Periodontal and Peri-implant Diseases and Conditions, individuals’ peri-implant condition was assessed using several indices and radiographs. Gingival thickness (GT), gingival phenotype (GP), keratinized gingival width, and EA were also measured. Clustered Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) models were employed to account for patient-level data dependency, yielding odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals ( p < 0.05). A significant difference in EA was observed between peri-implantitis, peri-implant health, and peri-implant mucositis ( p = 0.001). The peri-implantitis group had the greatest EA. Wide EAs (EA > 30°) were independently associated with greater probing depth, clinical attachment level, gingival index, and a borderline increase in BOP percentage. In conclusion, EA was the only independent factor associated with peri-implantitis after adjustment for peri-implant soft tissue characteristics and plaque accumulation. Patients whose implants have an EA above 30° are significantly more associated with peri-implantitis. Additional studies are needed to further elucidate the relationship between EA and peri-implant tissue condition.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. BMC Oral Health, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Oral Surgery
Oral SurgeryDentistry