Advanced Engineering Materials· 2026Q2
Supporting AI Readiness Through Digital Workflows in Materials Science
- 1citations
- Q2SCImago
- 2026year
Short summary
Digital workflows in materials science, exemplified by 13 contributions from the MaterialDigital initiative, enhance AI-readiness by creating explicit, repeatable, and machine-actionable pipelines for heterogeneous data.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Key points
- Digital workflows create explicit, repeatable, and machine-actionable pipelines for materials science data.
- AI-readiness is defined by the documented capacity of workflows to be reliably interpreted and executed by automated systems.
- Thirteen workflow contributions from the MaterialDigital initiative were analyzed across eight comparison aspects.
- Stable data structures, persistent artifacts, executable orchestration, and scientific validation are recurring foundations for AI-ready research.
AI-generated from the title and abstract; the full text is not read.
Abstract
Materials science produces heterogeneous data across experiments, simulations, and industrial processes that often remain bound to local formats, manual procedures, and project‐specific software. Digital workflows address this fragmentation through explicit, repeatable, and machine‐actionable pipelines. This article examines 13 workflow contributions from the second and third funding phases of the MaterialDigital initiative. The contributions cover data acquisition and FAIR storage, simulation automation, multiscale integration, and AI/ML‐driven optimization. Here, AI‐readiness denotes the documented capacity of workflows and their artifacts to be reliably interpreted, executed, assessed, reused, and, where intended, invoked or adapted by automated systems; it does not require the direct application of artificial intelligence. Eight comparison aspects capture data and metadata, reusable artifacts, orchestration, robustness, cross‐scale coupling, transfer validation, learning and optimization, and adaptive or agent‐accessible operation. By distinguishing demonstrated capabilities from plans, the comparison shows how workflows support AI‐ready research both through integrated AI methods and through structured, traceable, and reusable pipelines. Across the projects, stable data structures, persistent artifacts, executable orchestration, and scientific validation recur as foundations, whereas adaptive operation and agent‐accessible interfaces remain specialized. Wider interoperability would additionally benefit from shared interfaces and explicit, portable descriptions of workflow artifacts.
The authors' abstract, as published at the source. Advanced Engineering Materials, 2026 · DOI ↗
Continue with a free account
Ask the paper: 3 free questions a day about this paper; save it, get its citation, new summaries every day for your field. Takeaways are Premium.
Continue free on the webSign in with Google or Apple; no card needed. You come back to this paper.
On your phone:
Field: Materials Chemistry
Materials ChemistryMaterials Science